Message from @thr33
Discord ID: 488196884360331285
looks like it was settled through the supreme court in 1898 re:their interpretation of the 14th amendment. so it could be overturned maybe?
The Supreme Court ruled that it's unconstitutional to deny birthright citizenship on the basis of race, but it hasn't ruled out restricting it for foreigners, and it's actually affirmed stripping native tribes of citizenship, so long as they are neither deported nor obliged to pay taxes.
ah
(The Constitution directly uses the phase "excluding Indians untaxed".)
so could a simple bill in congress restrict it for foreigners then?
Yes.
In fact, there are already exceptions.
They're just very narrow.
And the Supreme Court has upheld them
do you think the current supreme court would uphold it?
or would roberts cuck?
I think it'd be best, in any case, to get one more justice in there
yea
i think one of breyer or ginsburg is out by 2020
Ginsburg
And I think Sotomayor would be more likely to be off the court soon than Breyer in all honesty
A new immigration law would likely be upheld.
But Kavanaugh is actually to the left of me in terms of jurisprudence
So who knows
north korea cucked
maga
<@&462745116768075776>
RED STORM ALERT
RED STORM ALERT
Tuesday, November 6, 2018 is...
***56 Days Away!***
Be sure to prepare to get every right-leaning acquaintance, friend, and family member out to the polls! This includes any right-leaning Internet friends/acquaintances of voting age who may live in other parts of the USA...
This movie
My God
Hold on, the fuck?
White phosphorus?
Is this being corroborated by other sources?
OH FUCK ME!!!
Please tell me this is fake
Jesus Christ
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
They just admitted to using it too.
In like 2016
Other sources are repeating the claim but most aren't treating it as credible because the Russian government is claiming it
Also Swedish Elections are today
@ThatRightWingFish yeah I think we'll find out some of the first results in three hours
Yep