Message from @Red Storm (in NYC)
Discord ID: 402281778406227970
there is a very, very, very small fraction of the population who would be willing to tolerate war on American soil
they don't get pragmatism and getting to where you want to be steadily
Do /pol/fags actually believe in shit like white nationalism, the Jewish Question, etc. or is it just a meme
remember that EVERY SINGLE WAR since the Civil War has been OFF American soil
if total collapse happens, how do these faggots know that people won't be clamoring for communism?
I mean, if it comes to having the guns taken, I'll fight, but I'm not going to fucking cross my fingers for it
there are many people who would rather have communism than starvation and bullets
yeah, I'd fight too
but I'd rather use my fucking brains and persuasive skills
if it came down to a fight, it would boil down to random chance
@Snickers yeah, there's a nugget of truth in it, but the thing is a lot of them go way too far with it
some retard could get lucky and shoot me in the head
or I could win a battle with my side, only to have us all killed instantly by a drone strike
someone like Jared Taylor is much more appealing than this accelerationist idiocy
Right, but are most of them legitimately pushing for a white ethnostate, questioning how Jews run everything, etc. or are they just LARPing for whatever reason
it's hard to tell who is LARPing and who isn't
however, I would bet that the kinds of posters who go "hurr instead of voting in the midterms, just take up arms and start a race war instead" are larpers or shills looking to get people in trouble
Trump's approval in the most vulnerable districts:
Competitive Republican House Seats: 15
1. Arizona-2 (42%)/California-25 (36%)/New Jersey-2 (45%)
2. California-39 (41%)
3. California-48 (50%)
4. California-49 (45%)
5. Colorado-6 (37%)
6. Florida-26 (41%)
7. Florida-27 (48%)
8. Minnesota-2 (42%)
9. Nebraska-2 (43%)
10. New York-19 (35%)
11. New York-22 (41%)
12. Texas-7 (41%)
13. Texas-23 (37%)
14. Virginia-10 (46%)
15. Washington-8 (33%)
I'm pushing to make the demographics better too, I'm not blind, but as for ethnostates where there's strict rules for who is allowed to stay and who gets deported isn't going to realistically happen
I'd say pushing family values back onto families, and having an immigration system similar to pre-'65 is how I'd put us back on track
in the Alabama election, there was a poll right before that said Jones would win by 10% (far from it) and another that said Moore would win by 10% (nope)
I wouldn't trust polls since they can be very ambiguous.
@FLanon yeah, that makes much more sense than "hurr, let's import the entire third world...and then we're GUARANTEED to win!"
data's better than no data, that's how I see it
yeah, but the question is...how do you use data to make decisions ?
whether or not Trump is popular in those districts, we still need to put as much effort in as possible
now, you could argue that we should ignore safe red and safe blue areas
that's true
but it's hard to tell what's truly 'safe'
tbh the Media should just tell what each politicians' voting record is instead of shoving polls saying who is in the lead, so people can make decisiosn based on policy not advancing whatever politician is ahead
pollsters should ask voters what politicians should do differently
the media doesn't care about democracy and making voters informed
they're in cahoots with a lot of them, wikileaks showed this
I can understand turning to more radical means if things collapse...but voting for people for the purpose of making things collapse is so retarded
not only are you not guaranteed to win, you're also not guaranteed to cause the collapse as quickly as you might want
if it happens, but not to make it happen deliberately
exactly
there's better ways of going at it
if we had better margins in the house and senate, we'd have a) a wall b) a better immigration policy, literally fixes the country in generations