We dont know. We would have to go there and study them

Even thr photographers that took the photos of the dying bear admit its not cause of climate change.

According to mainstream science. A volcano could erupt and block out the sun and the ice caps could cover north America in a short time. Again. Anytime.

Then the polar bears will thrive eventually again

They arent even endangered. They are vulnerable.

And i dont believe the counts.

i think the polar bears would freeze to death then

tbh

Not all of them

They would migrate south

Some would likely survive

“ I am TEN BEARS”

@Citizen Z what is the point of the government lying about dead polar bears

for fun?

So you acknowledge they lie?

governments lie all the time, but for a reason. regardless of the reason why would they lie about polar bear deaths?

https://b8f65cb373b1b7b15feb-c70d8ead6ced550b4d987d7c03fcdd1d.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/cms/reports/documents/000/002/327/original/Carbon-Majors-Report-2017.pdf?1499691240
Just 100 companies are responsible for 71 percent of the CO2 yet the layman must pay the bill, because campaign donations say so.

Money

but goverments lying about climate change would require that CO2 doesnt do anything to the atmosphere? is there any evidence of that?

It's a tricky one

What I've heard is that C02 creates a one way blanket that allows heat in but does not allow heat out

Well Something to that affect anyway

But I don't know much about it

What I do know is that smog is a real thing, and that Carbon particles released from co2 emitting buildings/cars also are a problem and cause early death

So I can't see why there would be any active support for fossil fuels

People in the cities often blow their nose and it's black with soot. Now tell me that's something we shouldn't worry about?

i think anyone thinking that climate change isnt real just needs to walk into a green house and see where the name comes from

yeah have you seen china?

Even the smog over London in the UK is very noticeable, it's awful to see

And I think it's wonderful that people are doing their own research etc. But I do worry that climate hoax people will start to put people off caring for the environment and everything else that goes with pollution

It's sad when the climate is mentioned, but in a more environmental sense and you're talking about plastic pollution and breathing problems in Cities, and someone just goes "pffft that government hoax? No thank you"

It's like hang on people are dying here, not just humans but the animal kingdom too

over here in nz anti pollution and green energy is quite a thing but we only have 4 mil so 😦

Even if you don't believe in the warming of the climate, the benefits that green energy provide in terms of other pollution problems are beneficial

ultimatley i would put cancer and other health issues as more scary than this cell phone radiation or whatever is being come up with because unlike cellphone radiation which may cause cancer this stuff does cause cancer

Yep

it is in terms of price

some parts of the world cant run hydro electrics and wind power for decent prices but thats where nuclear comes in i guess

Everything has a cause and effect. If I get a cat, I'll likely have less birds visit my garden etc. So I don't understand what it's hard to see that Carbon dioxide pollution will likely have some kind of effect, and probably one that no one will be able to predict. so why take that risk? I've always thought preventing Something is easier and pays off in the long run, than waiting for something bad to happen and then go about curing it

looking foward to fusion power i guess

Them fusion pellets