Not so much for debating

besides

they have sources

reliable ones

with correct information

I said don't send us on wild goose chase

Link the sources themselves

It's called decency

"don't send us on a wild goose chase"

each point on the article is supported by a source that is linked

it's not hard to find

That's what you do in a properly structured argument

How about you discuss the points yourself

We are debating, not engaging in a link war.

I sent one link

After explaining it

he didn't seem to believe me so I linked an article with peer reviewed sources

That's what you call an explanation?

it's not hard to understand

hey just a question

what's your stance on this

"The sun is what drives the climate. Not your car."

the sun isn't doing anything

Oh ok

he didn't believe my statement so I backed it up

Citizen is just as guilty btw

also who appointed you as debate referee

I refuted his points and provided evidence

How about you say that over the course of millions of years the sun has been steadily increasing

But in the Permian extinction when the sun was much weaker everything was killed thanks to carbon dioxide

You can't expect them to check the link every time, especially when they don't know what they are looking for.

that's not what happened in the permian

Or was it something else? I forgot the name, but there is a period.

!mute @Sweeping

Sweeping#6287 (302161212630630401) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

the permian-triassic extinction event was caused by several factors

none of them spurred by the sun

@void creature boi are you listening to me

yes I am

My point was the sun was much weaker back then, yet the temp shot up anyway

it wasn't weaker back then

Why? Greenhouse gases