@UltimateLifeformGappy ^^^^

Looks like it was 17000 feet not 299 feet

Okay so three things:
1. That's not a right triangle, it's isosceles. The formula depends on it being a right triangle. With an isosceles triangle the sides could be literally any length. That's why you're getting the exact same distance you put in.
2. You're using a different input. The height and angle are still the same, but you're using 17,188 feet instead of the agreed upon 15,840 feet.
3. My math with the 300 ft only used the height of the observer and the angle of 0.02 to find the distance at which the angle would be 0.02. It didn't use the three mile distance at all.

15k feet for 5 feet not 6

I never said 15840 feet

I said about 3 miles

Either way your math is obviously wrong

It doesn't work that way

Mr Z isnt good at maths it seems

Its to bad globies are stupid

https://youtu.be/4JRp3rjWt2w

@UltimateLifeformGappy#4626 are you blind it's a right triangle for the angle to the ground an isosceles triangle for the cone of vision.

Gone

Ya

Angle to the ground from 300 ft away is 1.145 degrees

No its .02 degrees

😂

Ur wrong do the math

😋

Everyone knows if you look across a football field everything shrinks to nothing

Duh

Everyone knows .02 degrees isnt real

Try doing some math

😄

Lol

I'm trying to figure out what he screwed up

Just another troll hell bent on arguing with me and will give fake math to try and deceive me

Its common sense

I figured it out. He used radians not degrees

Poor soul

A simple mistake cost him his flat earth server participation

😀

conversion sux

1 radian is just under 57.3 degrees

Poor guy

Im sticking to my story