Message from @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧
Discord ID: 557612631695949832
yes, it IS
-- what you do claim it to be then
it's it's own thing
<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> lmao
language is socially constructed in that we assign symobls and sounds to meanings
math is reproducible, even if we don't use the same language to communicate it
for example, 1+1=2, even if you use different symbols
for instance if you used A+A=B
the math still holds, even if you communicate it differently
math is a concept etc
its a language though ..as ive said
or further: A%A$B
math is reproducible independently
it's a clear objective thing
language isn't reproducible
thing? oh ? you can grab math?
can you grab words in the air? too? <:lul:484994724118134784>
and no ..maths is not clear -- all the time
?
in case you didnt know
you could erase all of our mathematical knowledge and we can reproduce it
just like ANY other "Language" --> math can be used to lie & decieve ...and or to tell/present/show truths
you can lie about math
but math itself doesn't lie
could you share how math can be used to lie and decieve?
because to me it just looks like those cases are an improper application or a failure to understand it
can make a mathematical equation that says an elephant can balance on it's trunk
"Equations" can be tweaked to fit whatever you want it to.
.
-- Mathematics²? yeah, all their numbers, equations, and formulas ..that (so-called) "prove things" and/or present sheer 'facts' ..have always kept changing throughout time. and still do.
-- scientists have substituted/substitute mathematics² (MYTHematics) for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
-- mathematics .. is/are a mere product of the intellect without any physical reality, and as such could-not/CAN NOT provide physical causes in the investigation of nature.\
-- "Differential calculus".. They expand the deceit to "infinity", and put everything into circular argument.
.
Physics you say?
▬and CALCULUS?
.... Ever heard of Louis Essen?... I highly doubt you have because he was conveniently silenced over 40+ years ago ! "The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis"? A member of the National Physical Laboratory of the UK from which he retired in 1972 after being quietly warned not to continue his contradiction of Einstein's theory of relativity. _"No one has attempted to refute my arguments, but I was warned that if I persisted I was likely to spoil my career prospects... the continued acceptance and teaching of relativity hinders the development of a rational extension of electromagnetic theory."_ - Louis Essen F.R.S. "Relativity and time signals", Wireless World, Oct78, p44
-- What about (freemason) "Sir" Isaac Newton→ (a 33rd Degree Mason), .. Isaac Newton, who's said to be the discoverer of gravity, knew there were problems with his theory. He claims to have invented the idea early in his life, but he knew that no mathematician of his day would approve of his theory, so he invented a whole new branch of mathematics, called fluxions, just to "prove" his theory. This became calculus, a deeply flawed branch having to do with so-called "infinitesimals" which have never been observed. Then when Einstein invented a new theory of gravity, he too, used an obscure bit of mathematics called tensors. It seems that every time there is a theory of gravity, it is mixed up with fringe" mathematics. Newton, by the way, was far from a secular scientist, and the bulk of his writings is actually on theology and Christianity.
you cant make equation tweaked to fit whatever tho
Is this a shitpost?
i wish i could tho
https://youtu.be/TbNymweHW4E <:lul:484994724118134784>
<:smart:484956754489376781>
would be useful on my physics test
Yes math can be used improperly
Generally through faulty assumptions and correlations
just like english can be used improperly
<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>
MUSIC is a LANGUAGE too
m'kaybee
English can't be used improperly
well math is human invention to describe reality
Because language is subjective