Probably got some terms wrong in my explanation

But this what I've been taught

Usually it's written as F = ma
a=F/m is a rearrangement

@SeekingTruth then in which case light must have mass to have mass times acceleration to cause the force observed here
9. WAVE PROPULSION: https://imgur.com/BOi8zNF

@SeekingTruth May I please see your WEIGHT of light please

Ha

Weight can't even exist without gravity, which I doubt you even believe in

@Syntax Funny that because Archimedes WEIGHED things almost 2000 years before gravity was invented

Buoyancy works off of weight

Sorry I want @SeekingTruth to first show me how light has mass with which to hold a force

You actually need to apply calculations to convert that to mass if you want to use it in other equations related to force

Afterall

convert to mass?

Weight is just force

So it's not mass is it?

Nope

No mass, no force

it's mass x acceleration

right no mass is ZERO

ZERO x anything = ZERO

But

You still do not believe in gravity

Science here, not belief

So you can't claim anything about Archimedes considering weight is just the mass x the acceleration due to gravity that the object is experiencing

@SeekingTruth WRONG, matter is measured in mols

WRONG

which is matter

``` mass is the amount of matter something has```

that's WRONG

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mole_(unit)

u h

Mass isn't any kind of quantity

I mean

I worded that wrong

Mass itself is not a specific measurement

Mass can be representing in kg and plenty of other forms

@SeekingTruth you just said that mass is the amount of matter something has so you've just contradicted yourself

Atoms != matter

How many atoms does an electron contain?

Or a proton?

@Syntax May I see a photograph of an electron or a proton please?