REALLY?

@halla555 So what happened did the rocket just decide to increase thrust 10 fold coincidentally the moment the gas cloud touched the rocket?

Because I put it to you the thrust is not generated by the jet of hot gas, rather the reaction off the walls of the CONTAINER

Tell me what CONTAINER is there in the infinite vacuum of space to generate thrust off?

Not a lot of thrust, so why isn't this hot jet of rocket isn't making the spring+rocket motor moving forwards significantly at all?

Where's the momentum in the opposite direction please?

@halla555 Stop dodging, are you telling me there's a coincidence that the rocket increases thrust ten fold the second the cloud hits the engine yes?

it's irrelevent that rockets are seen not producing significant thrust in a vacuum but yet when pressure comes into proximity of a rocket suddenly for no reason at all the thrust massively increases?

Show me please meaningful thrust in a vacuum of pressures of 10^-4 torr or lower

in a vacuum test chamber

I'm sorry Google are not a reputable source and they support Hillary Clinton

Oh and you know you you live on a spinning water ball how,

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/chemistry/5-60-thermodynamics-kinetics-spring-2008/video-lectures/lecture-10-entropy-and-irreversibility/ @halla555

Learn something

@halla555 what is your proof,

I am asking you to show me scientific method cause and effect experimentation to prove that rockets can produce meaningful thrust in a vacuum. you asserted p = mV. you acknowledged the mass of a vacuum is ZERO, so the momentum generated firing in a vacuum is also approximately ZERO although you can never have a perfect vacuum.
So I'm asking for some simple scientific experimental evidence and you're the one refusing to provide it, you're the one who sees a rocket not producing thrust in a vacuum and you're the one denying your own science

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/RsC2uhGzuO2ZS7lCxYZeOOb8PQgL1CXamDtI89UvS5Q/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419246750260264960/470397528605458442/FlatEarthEratosthenes.gif

@halla555 All of eratosthenes basic assumptions were wrong, so how can his result possibly be right?

@halla555
Eratosthenes assumed that the distance from Alexandria to Syrene was 5000 stadia, this is false
He assumed that Alexandria was due north of Syrene, this is also false.
He assumed that Syrene was on the tropic of Cancer, this is also false
He assumed Earth was a perfect sphere, even Neil De Grasse Tyson says this is false
He assumed all light from the sun is parallel, you know that is false.

Show me a thruster in a vacuum chamber making a precision maneuver.

Oh shoot. Derp derp. You cant. You have a belief system. You are part of a religion. @halla555 @halla555

So how can Eratosthenes have possible proven anything?

@halla555 The only science denier here is you

BALLOON ROCKETS DO NOT PUSH OFF A VACUUM: https://imgur.com/C8Y0NCn

Why is the balloon rocket not moving?

😂

I'm not asking you to be a science denier, I'm asking you to embrace cause and effect scientific method and be a real scientist

@halla555 you are nothing but pseudoscience halla555

You have zero proof of your belief system

It's a demonstration of zero sum equations of momentum

It demonstrates when the air coming out of the straw diverges just enough in the right way (as if it would under high vacuum) the rocket car no longer propels forward. Which means the action reaction happening from balloon to straw isnt enough to push the car. It needs air to push off.

Mass of vacuum chamber = 0.
Mass of rocket propellant = 10 grams
Velocity of rocket propellant = 3,000 meters per second
Velocity of rocket = mV/M = ZERO x 3000 / 0.01 = ZERO

mV=Mv

Very simple

Show us a demonstration of a thruster performing a precision maneuver inside a vacuum chamber. @halla555

0

Then we might believe you.