it is moving

in a vacuum

dosent matter that its not significant

@halla555 Well it's what they are shown to do in a vacuum in an observable testable repeatable experiment

I.e. not move much

When the chamber ceases to be a vacuum, oh yes then you get lots of thrust

So we can say the thrust is directly proportional to the density of the medium

THE RAPID MOTION AND COLLISIONS OF MOLECULES WITH THE WALLS OF THE CONTAINER "CAUSES" GAS PRESSURE: https://imgur.com/a/IoZI0kk

@halla555 Please explain why the rocket isn't producing meaninful thrust in a vacuum

BALLOON ROCKETS DO NOT PUSH OFF A VACUUM: https://imgur.com/C8Y0NCn

@halla555 Please explain why the car didn't move forwards when a vacuum cleaner was used to suck out the air?

@halla555 how long does it take for momentum to be transferred?

Is there like a lag or a delay or something?

in a vacuum, what are they reaction off?

how do you get momentum off a medium with effectively zero mass?

```The medium has nothing to do with momentum```

REALLY?

@halla555 So what happened did the rocket just decide to increase thrust 10 fold coincidentally the moment the gas cloud touched the rocket?

Because I put it to you the thrust is not generated by the jet of hot gas, rather the reaction off the walls of the CONTAINER

Tell me what CONTAINER is there in the infinite vacuum of space to generate thrust off?

Not a lot of thrust, so why isn't this hot jet of rocket isn't making the spring+rocket motor moving forwards significantly at all?

Where's the momentum in the opposite direction please?

@halla555 Stop dodging, are you telling me there's a coincidence that the rocket increases thrust ten fold the second the cloud hits the engine yes?

it's irrelevent that rockets are seen not producing significant thrust in a vacuum but yet when pressure comes into proximity of a rocket suddenly for no reason at all the thrust massively increases?

Show me please meaningful thrust in a vacuum of pressures of 10^-4 torr or lower

in a vacuum test chamber

I'm sorry Google are not a reputable source and they support Hillary Clinton

Oh and you know you you live on a spinning water ball how,

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/chemistry/5-60-thermodynamics-kinetics-spring-2008/video-lectures/lecture-10-entropy-and-irreversibility/ @halla555

Learn something

@halla555 what is your proof,

I am asking you to show me scientific method cause and effect experimentation to prove that rockets can produce meaningful thrust in a vacuum. you asserted p = mV. you acknowledged the mass of a vacuum is ZERO, so the momentum generated firing in a vacuum is also approximately ZERO although you can never have a perfect vacuum.
So I'm asking for some simple scientific experimental evidence and you're the one refusing to provide it, you're the one who sees a rocket not producing thrust in a vacuum and you're the one denying your own science

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/RsC2uhGzuO2ZS7lCxYZeOOb8PQgL1CXamDtI89UvS5Q/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419246750260264960/470397528605458442/FlatEarthEratosthenes.gif

@halla555 All of eratosthenes basic assumptions were wrong, so how can his result possibly be right?

@halla555
Eratosthenes assumed that the distance from Alexandria to Syrene was 5000 stadia, this is false
He assumed that Alexandria was due north of Syrene, this is also false.
He assumed that Syrene was on the tropic of Cancer, this is also false
He assumed Earth was a perfect sphere, even Neil De Grasse Tyson says this is false
He assumed all light from the sun is parallel, you know that is false.

Show me a thruster in a vacuum chamber making a precision maneuver.

Oh shoot. Derp derp. You cant. You have a belief system. You are part of a religion. @halla555 @halla555

So how can Eratosthenes have possible proven anything?