It draws you to be biased

You can check the description

neither is non-empirical non-peer reviewed self-research some random guy did

that's experimentation. in the first hand

hahaha

YouTube - Someone who has studied many sources to explain their beliefs.

Looking at the horizon isn't how the scientific method is used

USE MATH

SRSLY

that's a video that actually PROVES GLOBE EARTh

First of all, does everybody know what peer review is?

Did you not check the video yourself

With a bike and two sticks @void creature

Those are some types of experiments

Oooh Astra you a simulation earther!!!??

They do

Yes @Le boy

Alex Chertnik
Published on Aug 1, 2016
in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km.

in the description of the video

wait a second

:"in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km."

Oml

Ooh onether one yeey

he proved globe earth

lOl

@void creature it's not peer review so it doesn't prove your side either

It's a two way street

No need to prove its logical

Yeah but he just used "evidence" without looking at it first

I’m an undecided

I support both sides

It's not peer review so we pretend it doesn't exist

There's no reason for our specific planet to be flat while the 8 others are spherical

You’ve already said your a Flat Earther

I want evidence of flat earth

so far there's been none

Yes and the reason for that is gravity @Le boy

@void creature you gave none for your side either

Ik

You can't disprove gravity

You guys suck at debating