hey fellow glober

If you really do have a party then its hard to trust you to be impartial

But you don't know my party

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GrihjP5tTTM

I admire the thiccness of our fellow bae earth

@Muncher is that a peer review

@Le boy earth too thicc

It doesn’t matter what your party is

As I said before youtube is not a source

If you have a party

Idk is it @Hamburger Guy

To thicc to measure it's thiccness

It draws you to be biased

You can check the description

neither is non-empirical non-peer reviewed self-research some random guy did

that's experimentation. in the first hand

hahaha

YouTube - Someone who has studied many sources to explain their beliefs.

Looking at the horizon isn't how the scientific method is used

USE MATH

SRSLY

that's a video that actually PROVES GLOBE EARTh

First of all, does everybody know what peer review is?

Did you not check the video yourself

With a bike and two sticks @void creature

Those are some types of experiments

Oooh Astra you a simulation earther!!!??

They do

Yes @Le boy

Alex Chertnik
Published on Aug 1, 2016
in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km.

in the description of the video

wait a second

:"in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km."

Oml

Ooh onether one yeey

he proved globe earth

lOl

@void creature it's not peer review so it doesn't prove your side either

It's a two way street

No need to prove its logical

Yeah but he just used "evidence" without looking at it first