Message from @void creature
Discord ID: 564560258316632074
If you really do have a party then its hard to trust you to be impartial
But you don't know my party
I admire the thiccness of our fellow bae earth
@Muncher is that a peer review
It doesn’t matter what your party is
As I said before youtube is not a source
If you have a party
Idk is it @Hamburger Guy
To thicc to measure it's thiccness
It draws you to be biased
You can check the description
neither is non-empirical non-peer reviewed self-research some random guy did
that's experimentation. in the first hand
hahaha
YouTube - Someone who has studied many sources to explain their beliefs.
Looking at the horizon isn't how the scientific method is used
USE MATH
SRSLY
First of all, does everybody know what peer review is?
Did you not check the video yourself
With a bike and two sticks @void creature
Those are some types of experiments
Oooh Astra you a simulation earther!!!??
They do
Alex Chertnik
Published on Aug 1, 2016
in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km.
in the description of the video
wait a second
:"in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km."
Oml
Ooh onether one yeey
he proved globe earth
lOl
@void creature it's not peer review so it doesn't prove your side either
It's a two way street
No need to prove its logical
Yeah but he just used "evidence" without looking at it first
I’m an undecided