if u have images u can send them to me and i will post them for u

Images are usually non-productive.

i'm just saying ;-;

k.

https://images.app.goo.gl/zjTnsXSDazfGq9Wa7

Yeah still no image

Ah, I see. The redirect link.

It links to a presentation with no sources for its claims.

You can see a YouTube video where they seem to prove the issue with the Chicago skyline

But if indeed the buildings are visible that should be well below the curve

It raises a question

Where were they looking from?

How high?

And how far away?

From the beach /ground level

I need a source for that, the video as well.

And, in that slide presentation, the claims of the "flat earth map" being used by governmental organizations and mapping authorities are false, as that's just an alternate depiction of the standard map we see today. Which is a map of Earth presented in 2d format.

There's quite a few different videos of the Chicago skyline

https://youtu.be/8P_Bm_8xiWs

There can't be that much curve in the way.

What's the height of the vantage point?

The other thing I find interesting is super long bridges made without accounting for curvature

https://youtu.be/P1xuz-zNy1A

Also, the mirage effect is real.

http://www.whale.to/a/13271_1145796812113309_8079385559108134732_n.jpg

Wait so uh what side are u guys arguing for?

They showed the mirage effect can't be at work here with Chicago because the image is not inverted

@Letsdo7his YT I'm arguing flat side

Ok and he’s arguing round?

Yes

K

So 1. Buildings etc visible too far away when they should be behind the curve 2. Super long bridges built without accounting for curve

The image being inverted has nothing to do with it.

someone change my mind abt anti vaccination

I'll do that.

After I'm done with this.

I wanna know why anyone thinks it’s a good idea

I heard it explained that a true mirage of that kind would be inverted

Oh I agree it's a terrible idea.

we're on the same side then

Oh, and no, it wouldn't.