Earth's not flat cause we have proof of:
1- Gravity
2- Gravity being less at the Earth's equator because of it's spin
3- images of earth from space
4- countless ground experiments to prove it's not flat
the usual shebang I encounter is "we don't know gravity exists" "the experiments to prove that weight was less at the equator were faked" "the photos were doctored" "the experiments were fake"
then I'm assaulted with youtube conspiracy theory videos and images that are either fake or actually disprove them
then after a while I get banned from the server for being "a troll"

no, you have something which you THINK makes all of the above possible on a flat disc

Gravity makes matter clump into balls

see you're proving my point

Lemme guess- density?

Again, proving my point y'all.

Did you even read my message to the full?

At a base level, Flat Earth is a dogma.

There's no debate, just chances for y'all to flex science jargon.

So I should respect the opinion that women are property and blacks should be slaves?

kek y'all are fitting my description

Fitting the dogma. Everything we say is dismissed as a lie.

You're supposedly "open to arguments", but every bit of proof we provide is tossed into the rubbish bin.

Nah, there's something called fact.

the stuff I encounter is "we don't know gravity exists" "the photos were doctored" "the experiments were fake"

Anything said is dismissed as a lie.

Definition of a dogma.

Because I'm concerned about the rate this way of thinking is rising.

No, you stick to baseless theories with no verifiable proof and a mountain of evidence to the contrary.

the usual shebang I encounter is "we don't know gravity exists" "the photos were doctored" "the experiments were fake"
then I'm assaulted with youtube conspiracy theory videos and images that are either fake or actually disprove them

I'm debating.

But we've already proven that the Earth is round past a reasonable doubt.

like man i just cant see past 2 miles so earth has to be flat right guys

ok <#538929818834698260> time

matthew you and me

let's debate

k @Matthew 'Mati'

Here's my argument

Earth's not flat cause we have proof of:
1- Gravity
2- Gravity being less at the Earth's equator because of it's spin
3- images of earth from space
4- countless ground experiments to prove it's not flat
the usual shebang I encounter is "we don't know gravity exists" "the experiments to prove that weight was less at the equator were faked" "the photos were doctored" "the experiments were fake"
then I'm assaulted with youtube conspiracy theory videos and images that are either fake or actually disprove them

if you attempt to refute my points without using the "fake" argument, I'll be impressed

So you're not going to try to refute my arguments?

so anyone going to debate me

they're online

but I know their style

spamming youtube links

that's not someone you can win against

nah but the sheer amount of roles on his person tells me all I need

if I said our coffee has tiny bits of arsenic in it to slowly kill the working class he'd probably jump on it

how about you

what's your views

evolution or creation

what are your opinions

earth

I need someone to debate with to complete my exploration into the world of conspiracy theories

its 4pm

ah jaxa you'll do

will you debate?

yeah I'll do it if you're a flat earther

or an antivaxxer

or a creationist

are you any of those

ok let's go in <#538929818834698260>

@Basil you can just read what I put up there

already did

k nothing

epic gamer moment

Stars in general can be a couple colours, but the most common are blue, orange, and red.

Their colour is influenced by their temperature.

Well, it's mainly the temperature that they burn at that influences it.

There's no pink stars.

And there's no images of pink stars, either.

Can you show me one?

I forgot my stuff for a second

It happens ok?

I was thinking about fire

Because THAT is influenced by the fuel mix

And anyways, Basil, you used the "fake" argument.

With no actual proof, either.

The reason some nebulas and star clusters appear pink is because of the large amount of ultraviolet radiation

That ionizes hydrogen atoms

I said there weren't pink stars.

Some young star CLUSTERS and NEBULAS appear pink when seen through a telescope

This is from the ionizing effects of ultraviolet radiation emitted by these stars

They aren't actually pink.

Your original point was, quote, "My response to point 3 is that there are many photos from space to prove that the earth is round but also there are many photos of stars being purple and pink which I hope all of us know is not true because there’s no such thing as pink or purple stars. Both these pictures are from the scientific group meaning if their lying about stars then what’s not saying there lying about the earth. We as flatties will destroy the roundies"

So, @Basil , your point is that you don't trust the people who take the photographs of earth because they also took photographs of pink nebulas and star clusters?

Oh, and purple stars exist 100%.

As I said before, the "pink" is an ionization effect.

When electrons knocked off atoms through ionization rejoin with them, they emit photons (light)

This specific light is red, and when combined with starlight, which is white, it becomes pink from far away.

Ah they're offline.

Oh bugger.

@elle would you say I won this debate?

i disproved their only rebuttal

👍

anyone wanna debate?

@Crusader Jenkins you up?

oops wrong person

@Green Knight you up for a debate?

meet me in <#538929818834698260>

im a dreaded glober

Here's my argument
Earth's not flat cause we have proof of:
1- Gravity
2- Gravity being less at the Earth's equator because of it's spin
3- images of earth from space
4- countless ground experiments to prove it's not flat
the usual shebang I encounter is "we don't know gravity exists" "the experiments to prove that weight was less at the equator were faked" "the photos were doctored" "the experiments were fake"
then I'm assaulted with youtube conspiracy theory videos and images that are either fake or actually disprove them

if you attempt to refute my points without using the "fake" argument, I'll be impressed

Then you concede?

You weigh a teeny bit less at the equator than you do at the poles

Centripetal force

Which is wrong, as in a vacuum chamber a hammer will still fall

Because a butterfly has most of its surface area dedicated to resisting gravity.

Its wings flap, thrusting air downwards, and as each action must have an equal and opposite reaction, it is propelled upwards.

This is possible as it's an insect, and thus weighs very little, meaning that gravity has less of an effect on it.

Usually accomplished from a height.