Message from @Green Knight
Discord ID: 565270653998202901
Because a butterfly has most of its surface area dedicated to resisting gravity.
Its wings flap, thrusting air downwards, and as each action must have an equal and opposite reaction, it is propelled upwards.
This is possible as it's an insect, and thus weighs very little, meaning that gravity has less of an effect on it.
So for me the most compelling evidence of flat earth is the cases where an object or building or land mass is clearly visible from a distance such that it should be concealed behind the curve
Usually accomplished from a height.
France is visible from the top of the cliffs of Dover, but not on the beach below.
Just as an example
I've seen many examples
There's no image there.
Hmm
if u have images u can send them to me and i will post them for u
Images are usually non-productive.
i'm just saying ;-;
k.
Yeah still no image
Ah, I see. The redirect link.
It links to a presentation with no sources for its claims.
You can see a YouTube video where they seem to prove the issue with the Chicago skyline
It raises a question
Where were they looking from?
How high?
And how far away?
From the beach /ground level
I need a source for that, the video as well.
And, in that slide presentation, the claims of the "flat earth map" being used by governmental organizations and mapping authorities are false, as that's just an alternate depiction of the standard map we see today. Which is a map of Earth presented in 2d format.
There's quite a few different videos of the Chicago skyline
There can't be that much curve in the way.
What's the height of the vantage point?
The other thing I find interesting is super long bridges made without accounting for curvature
Also, the mirage effect is real.
Wait so uh what side are u guys arguing for?
They showed the mirage effect can't be at work here with Chicago because the image is not inverted
@Letsdo7his YT I'm arguing flat side
Ok and he’s arguing round?
Yes