When they go beyond, they dip

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Etzie has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

Oof

Simplest explanation, there is a hump of water in between the observer and the ship that obscures the bottom, like a hill

Ok listen this is a fact u watch a ship with the naked eye it goes out to sea disappears bottom first. Ship is gone u can’t see it anymore. U pull out a camera and zoom in and bring the ship back into view. That’s how it works idk if u were trying to say it doesn’t work like that

What made it disappear bottom first with the naked eye the first time u watched it disappear

???

I guess I'll admit I don't know this for sure, I haven't tried it myself, but I know regardless that it has been proven that ships drop in full camera view resolved and all

It might appear to be the case with a camera, because its resolution is nowhere near that of the eye. The advantage a camera has in this case is zoom.

Go out there and test it with your actual eye, since I assume you're a truth seeker.

I’ve seen a ton of videos of it being done

Funny how you have to see things first hand to actual compare things with "the naked eye"

Have u seen videos of it being done ?

A video or photograph at 1x optical zoom is not comparable to the naked eye.

You don't listen.

It isn't relevant. There is difference between zooming in and out and noting the resolution and zooming in on it and watching it dip in full view.

Ok but have u seen video of this being done

It is relevant, because he's making a comparison to the naked eye... Without using the naked eye.

I hear what ur saying but it’s not even close to being able to see when zoomed all the way out

Ahh, but that's where resolution comes in.

K I gotta go I’ll talk to u guys tomorrow

But I am focusing on the sinking ship effect here. What they are saying doesn't nullify it in any way

No it doesn't

Still if it was a sphere the proof would be there but it isn’t

Bye guys

It is though

Byeee

I’ll be back for more tomorrow lol

Last time I looked out on an ocean has been awhile

So I honestly don't know the scale of it in terms of what we can resolve

With my eyes

I need to buy a decent lens or telescope.

There is a limit to what the eye can see, it's such a small lens.

I think I might just buy a P1000

I have no incentive to do so currently

It has ridiculous zoom. I already have a camera with a huge resolution, but the problem is that the sensor is full frame, so in order to get any decent zoom you need a HUGE lense, or telescope.

They're not that expensive tbh

Depends if you'll use it often or not.

I wouldn't

It would be once in a blue moon for me if I got one

Because the only matter of interest I would have is observing distant objects in some locations, if say, I travel.
Where I live, there is trees and hills and various obstructions.
Maybe some astrophotography but I'd get bored of it