Message from @Etzie

Discord ID: 572964712392818698


2019-05-01 01:50:01 UTC  

It isn't relevant. There is difference between zooming in and out and noting the resolution and zooming in on it and watching it dip in full view.

2019-05-01 01:50:21 UTC  

Ok but have u seen video of this being done

2019-05-01 01:50:44 UTC  

It is relevant, because he's making a comparison to the naked eye... Without using the naked eye.

2019-05-01 01:50:45 UTC  

I hear what ur saying but it’s not even close to being able to see when zoomed all the way out

2019-05-01 01:51:07 UTC  

Ahh, but that's where resolution comes in.

2019-05-01 01:51:13 UTC  

K I gotta go I’ll talk to u guys tomorrow

2019-05-01 01:51:22 UTC  

But I am focusing on the sinking ship effect here. What they are saying doesn't nullify it in any way

2019-05-01 01:51:30 UTC  

No it doesn't

2019-05-01 01:51:33 UTC  

Still if it was a sphere the proof would be there but it isn’t

2019-05-01 01:51:42 UTC  

Bye guys

2019-05-01 01:51:55 UTC  

It is though

2019-05-01 01:51:56 UTC  

Byeee

2019-05-01 01:52:10 UTC  

I’ll be back for more tomorrow lol

2019-05-01 01:53:03 UTC  

Last time I looked out on an ocean has been awhile

2019-05-01 01:54:00 UTC  

So I honestly don't know the scale of it in terms of what we can resolve

2019-05-01 01:54:07 UTC  

With my eyes

2019-05-01 01:54:09 UTC  

I need to buy a decent lens or telescope.

2019-05-01 01:55:30 UTC  

There is a limit to what the eye can see, it's such a small lens.

2019-05-01 01:56:10 UTC  

I think I might just buy a P1000

2019-05-01 01:56:36 UTC  

I have no incentive to do so currently

2019-05-01 01:57:12 UTC  

It has ridiculous zoom. I already have a camera with a huge resolution, but the problem is that the sensor is full frame, so in order to get any decent zoom you need a HUGE lense, or telescope.

2019-05-01 01:57:22 UTC  

They're not that expensive tbh

2019-05-01 01:57:35 UTC  

Depends if you'll use it often or not.

2019-05-01 01:58:03 UTC  

I wouldn't

2019-05-01 01:58:26 UTC  

It would be once in a blue moon for me if I got one

2019-05-01 01:59:52 UTC  

Because the only matter of interest I would have is observing distant objects in some locations, if say, I travel.
Where I live, there is trees and hills and various obstructions.
Maybe some astrophotography but I'd get bored of it

2019-05-01 02:01:09 UTC  

It would be good for me to find a hobby tho

2019-05-01 02:02:07 UTC  

I took this with my camera. Unfortunately it's not the full resolution, raw photo which I can't get until I fix my computer.

2019-05-01 02:07:28 UTC  

It's the milky way, with Sag A* in the middle, on the left one of the bright objects is Saturn. Not sure which though.

2019-05-01 02:38:32 UTC  
2019-05-01 02:38:43 UTC  

What do u think of this information

2019-05-01 02:39:57 UTC  

It explains what’s happening with the boats going over the curve

2019-05-01 02:41:39 UTC  

Made sense to me

2019-05-01 02:50:51 UTC  

My favorite part was at the end when he plays with the color and contrast and u can still see the boat

2019-05-01 02:51:52 UTC  

Idk how after watching that u can still think the boat went over the curve. Or at least not question if it’s really going over the curve or not

2019-05-01 02:56:19 UTC  

I think it demands more investigation

2019-05-01 03:17:55 UTC  

Did u watch the video ?

2019-05-01 03:17:59 UTC  

Astral

2019-05-01 03:21:20 UTC  

He makes a false dichotomy, it is either curvature or an inferior mirage and if inferior mirage, no curvature whatsoever. And there isn't always inferior mirages going on for this to happen and the person acknowledges that we would continue to see the bottom without that mirage layer.

So, not really that great.
You see the ship dipping below bottom first while there is a mirage layer beneath it.

2019-05-01 03:22:01 UTC  

What about at the end when he plays with the color and contrast and can still see the boat