Message from @97 Eleven
Discord ID: 575066882437021736
Gravity is unproven and self-contradicting
You can't defend something rooted in nonsense
How so
Elaborate, please
Can you give me one concrete proof of gravity?
Of mass attracting mass
No, because there is none
Gravity is unproven
Gravity is the accepted scientific norm, therefore it is up to you to provide the burden of proof that it is not correct
You claim that mass attracts mass
It's your burden to prove that
Appeal to authority fallacy doesn't work here
Cavendish experiment set the framework for mass-mass attraction, ever since then countless more experiments have been done. And as I said before, any particle that has a nonzero Mass-momentum-stress tensor is affected by gravity. You can show the existence of gravitational wells using the bending of light, for example.
Besides, I'll need to find the video but there was an experiment done on the so called vomit comet, the aircraft that is used to simulate very low gravity environments easily where they take a transparent box with some dirt in it up into the aircraft, then when the gravity weakens it floats upwards and goes from a loose collection of dirt to distinct clumps
Yes.
That's not it's name.
It's the stress-energy tensor
Also referred to as the stress-energy-momentum tensor.
And no, they're not effected by gravity.
A nonzero value of the stress-energy tensor results in a certain curvature of spacetime shown by the metric tensor.
@97 Eleven Nathan says hi
Salutations to nathan
But, gravity is still non-renormalizable as an approach via perturbation theory fails.
The lights in the sky don't count as evidence, they're just holograms even though I have no evidence to back up that claim.
Therefore gravity as described by GR is inadequate.
*You've probably had more conversations with Nathan about this than I have, so using his arguments against me will make me auto-fail*
Trust what you see, but only when it applies to my theory, not yours.
Naw these aren't Nathan's arguments
We usually don't talk about QFT or QM in relation to my gravity dispute
I'd love to see you do that, then.
There currently is no QFT or QM for gravity
I think Nathan would be a lore adequate conversation partner compared to me.
Why converse on accepted physics?
"But, gravity is still non-renormalizable as an approach via perturbation theory fails."
Is basically established fact ^
So to you that means "gravity doesn't exist"?
If curved spacetime fails then yes gravity does not exist
I'm quite sure Nathan would disagree with that, hence why the aforementioned need for a conversation.