Message from @Satan
Discord ID: 488665583018311680
Otherwise it would allow Isis vids
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS The IBOR would allow ISIS videos.
Relevant xkcd as always
It's not freedoms of speech problem but it is censorship and it's within their right to do that tbh
However, there could be ways around the ISIS videos if they are found to incite violence.
Which is the current system
Eh you can find snuff with a few clicks what's your point
The IBOR would be useless as nothing would change
There’d just be a ton more porn on youtube
Nice <:snapsnap:484956825863585792>
However, people that have pro-trump views are being censored. Without having committed any incitement of hatred or violence.
Everyone protrump is being censored?
Are they being purged from the internet by the government? Or do sites just not want that stuff on their site
I can find YouTubers who actively support trump and still have their platform
If I was running a website and some fuckwit started going on about how trump is the messiah then id probably remove it, that’s not censorship though
@Satan The censorship is in the form of shadowbanning. You need to know specifically who or what you are looking for.
Where is this happening?
The rules in this server would also no longer apply
I could send satanic images and speak in not English and you couldn't stop me
It is censorship @xXPuppyLoverXx
It's within your right
And it doesn't violate their freedom of speech but it's still censorship
Censorship is when a government does it
It can be done by private entities but it revolves around the act of suppressing someone or something
@I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS Yes you could.
In this case, the crazy trump supporter is welcome to go outside and tell people and nobody will stop him
If you're looking for a truly uncensored platform then 4chan is your destination😂
Say if I invited Puppy to a party, and he starts saying the n word loads. I could tell puppy to shut the fuck up and kick him out the party, I wouldn't be cenosring him, I'd be showing him the door for unacceptable behaviour
:^)
N word
The thing is when you agree to use these websites you sign a contract and that means they can ban you if you break the terms of service
You already agreed that you could be kicked
You don't like it make your own website
The point I should take out of our conversation is that I can ban whomever I want for whatever reason I want. And any complaining from any of you would be hypocritical.
Sure, but we wouldn’t be claiming that you banning us is A. Censoring us or B. Violating our right to free speech
You are well within your right to ban people
It wouldn't be censoring according to the definition tho
But yes you are within your right to do it
However it would be a dick move