Message from @Σ5
Discord ID: 494077217182187542
What experiments mate
give me time to put up the link of the debate
Yes, that is a true assertion thank you.
Also how did they disprove relativity???
i dont agree
Well then you're wrong
relativity is a natural outcome of the aether
(turns out special relativity was derived from and is consistent with the aether hypothesis)
No it very much is not
Aether hypothesis?
ether
and it is
No, it is not. The simplest case is the aether model predicts that light travels at different speeds depending on your motion.
Lorentz ether theory is mathematically identical to einsteins relativity
with some semantical difrences
this goes over the details of why einstien was proven wrong and how flat earth is more valid
No, it is not at all, it is identical to special relativity (and also incredibly convoluted). It is not at all identical to relativity in general
(occams razer)
Lorentz aether is essentially the aether with epicycles, it certainly isn't a natural outcome and it also certainly isn't identical to relativity. It is identical to relativity in flat spacetime
to just use its simpler derived geometry than to use the bases of it
special relativity is also in flat spacetime
i actually derived relativity from ether
altho not formaly
relativity is simply an outcome of the doppler effect
Yes, but special relativity is a part of general relativity. Lorentz aether predicts completely wrong results in curved spacetime.
sigma 5 is an ostrich
yes
who else here is an ostrich and doesn't want to look at the facts of flat earth
im saying that relativity is derived from ether
No, it isn't
literaly is tho
Literally isn't though
its fake math
he was inspired by lorentz idea
Yes, in no way does that mean relativity is derived from it.
here is a rendering of a particle i made