Message from @Σ5

Discord ID: 494088689756930059


2018-09-25 10:04:44 UTC  

i state it so you get a better idea whats going on in my head

2018-09-25 10:05:06 UTC  

by giving a similar thaught

2018-09-25 10:05:52 UTC  

what i ment by natural consequence is i mena its a derived consept from the same equations

2018-09-25 10:05:57 UTC  

maybe slightly modified

2018-09-25 10:06:10 UTC  

but i havent lkooked into it to know if thats right or not

2018-09-25 10:09:03 UTC  

Wait are you two having a productive debate? In Ice Wall? <:ohheck:485078351162376202>

2018-09-25 10:09:11 UTC  

kinda

2018-09-25 10:09:23 UTC  

he disagrees with me that ether is consistent with special relativity

2018-09-25 10:09:48 UTC  

lorentz ether theory is mathematicly identical to special relativity in its predictions

2018-09-25 10:10:24 UTC  

lorents ether theory is the theory that space is a motionless medium that follows the wave equation

2018-09-25 10:10:35 UTC  

Yeah this is all above me tbh

2018-09-25 10:10:37 UTC  

then he argues that its the propogation of waves not the medium

2018-09-25 10:10:47 UTC  

i dont see the difrence

2018-09-25 10:10:47 UTC  

I know aminals I don't know physics

2018-09-25 10:11:08 UTC  

Wait but wasn't the aether theory dropped way back in the 1900s

2018-09-25 10:11:14 UTC  

im sure you know what i mean by that when i say it

2018-09-25 10:11:23 UTC  

No, this is not a productive debate, sigma 5 just keeps saying nonsense and lying about what I'm saying

2018-09-25 10:11:25 UTC  

it is becasue its useless now

2018-09-25 10:11:48 UTC  

e.g. ``he disagrees with me that ether is consistent with special relativity`` I have said completely explicitly literally 4 times that the aether is consistent with special relativity

2018-09-25 10:11:48 UTC  

skip the derivations and get right to the point

2018-09-25 10:12:03 UTC  

you explicitly said many times that its not

2018-09-25 10:12:16 UTC  

I have not said a single time that it is not.

2018-09-25 10:12:47 UTC  

ok

2018-09-25 10:13:04 UTC  

I have on the other hand, repeatedly, said that it is. e.g. ``Moist MayonnaiseToday at 11:26 AM
No, it is not at all, it is identical to special relativity (and also incredibly convoluted). It is not at all identical to relativity in general``

2018-09-25 10:13:05 UTC  

birds are reptiles

2018-09-25 10:13:14 UTC  

I'm just happy to read some non Kevin content tbh

2018-09-25 10:13:27 UTC  

@Σ5 hecc off that's wrong

2018-09-25 10:13:41 UTC  

@Yoda Yes the aether theory was dropped because it was shown to not be valid

2018-09-25 10:13:49 UTC  

birds are by definition reptiles, according to phylogenic classification

2018-09-25 10:14:22 UTC  

@Σ5 as are mammals

2018-09-25 10:14:27 UTC  

false

2018-09-25 10:14:38 UTC  

mamals are an earlier branch

2018-09-25 10:14:50 UTC  

There's a reason we have more specific classifications

2018-09-25 10:15:02 UTC  

like phylogenic clasification

2018-09-25 10:15:22 UTC  

in fact you need a reptile liscence to own certian types of birds

2018-09-25 10:16:06 UTC  

crocodiles and turtles are more closely related to birds than to lizards

2018-09-25 10:16:09 UTC  

@Σ5 nooo stop the biology debate....

2018-09-25 10:16:36 UTC  

Noo biology

2018-09-25 10:16:58 UTC  

Birds are closely related to old reptiles but they are a differnt, they aren't reptiles. It's as accurate as saying mammals are reptiles as they both share a common ancestor

2018-09-25 10:17:04 UTC  

We were all born out of god's magical grace lmaoo

2018-09-25 10:17:10 UTC  

they are by deffinition reptiles