but i do agree its less usefull and statisticly identical

i do think its intresting tho

bohm theory is deterministic but scientificly identical to the standard probabilistic model

Broglie bohm isn't a natural consequence of (I'm assuming by probabilistic model you mean quantum mechanics), it is an interpretation of quantum mechanics. It also isn't an aether theory if that's what you're implying

never said it was an ether theory

Then I don't see the relevance

i state it so you get a better idea whats going on in my head

by giving a similar thaught

what i ment by natural consequence is i mena its a derived consept from the same equations

maybe slightly modified

but i havent lkooked into it to know if thats right or not

Wait are you two having a productive debate? In Ice Wall? <:ohheck:485078351162376202>

kinda

he disagrees with me that ether is consistent with special relativity

lorentz ether theory is mathematicly identical to special relativity in its predictions

lorents ether theory is the theory that space is a motionless medium that follows the wave equation

Yeah this is all above me tbh

then he argues that its the propogation of waves not the medium

i dont see the difrence

I know aminals I don't know physics

Wait but wasn't the aether theory dropped way back in the 1900s

im sure you know what i mean by that when i say it

No, this is not a productive debate, sigma 5 just keeps saying nonsense and lying about what I'm saying

it is becasue its useless now

e.g. ``he disagrees with me that ether is consistent with special relativity`` I have said completely explicitly literally 4 times that the aether is consistent with special relativity

skip the derivations and get right to the point

you explicitly said many times that its not

I have not said a single time that it is not.

ok

I have on the other hand, repeatedly, said that it is. e.g. ``Moist MayonnaiseToday at 11:26 AM
No, it is not at all, it is identical to special relativity (and also incredibly convoluted). It is not at all identical to relativity in general``

birds are reptiles

I'm just happy to read some non Kevin content tbh

@Σ5 hecc off that's wrong

@Yoda Yes the aether theory was dropped because it was shown to not be valid

birds are by definition reptiles, according to phylogenic classification

@Σ5 as are mammals

false

mamals are an earlier branch

There's a reason we have more specific classifications

like phylogenic clasification

in fact you need a reptile liscence to own certian types of birds