lets presume we know about 2% of how DNA works, your trying to pass that off as a great knowledge

DNA defects are more often than not self correcting in mitosis, however if you are talking about meiosis we can correct there

2% is not alot

less than a slice of a pizza

How do you know it’s that small?

Kevin you aren't reading what I'm saying, you are presuming that you are already correct and saying nonsense

And also knowledge is not a thing you can easily slice up like that. You can’t know how much you don’t know without knowing what you don’t know.

Big Lover, your talking about details of DNA and not paying attention to the bigger picture

your thinking the trees are the entire forest, when they are just a few trees,

You are saying we know nothing about DNA while I explain the details of how much we actually know

I'm not saying we know nothing

I'm saying we know very little compared to what we will know given enough time and not being misdirected

You are ignoting the current understanding in your argument however

in comparison to what we will know in 1,000 years from now, or even 10,000 years from now

We will know more about everting on the future we can't dismiss all knowledge right now

your ignoring that our knowledge on the subject will grow, and that we are in the infancy of our knowledge of it

I'm not dismissing that we know some stuff about it, but we don't know everything or even 5%

if we knew everything, we could do what GOD does, and takes someone's genes and make a person from scratch

no womb, nothing

Kevin what you are saying is that we don't know enough so anything is possible even incest with the tree thing.

I'm saying, this is what we know currently our current extent and the actual future of the subject.

I'm working with speculation based on facts. You are trying to create a fanfiction of biology where you can justify the issue of inbreeding between two people and their children.

no, incest is wrong because it creates negative outcomes in children with genetic defects

I'm saying there was a reason why this didn't occur in the earlier generations and now it does occur

What about gay incest

Between consensual adults

Or incest with contraception

if children can't be created, I'm sure sex is wrong in the eyes of GOD. the whole point of sex is to create offspring.

Ok so is it wrong to have sex with an infertile wife?

The reason it didn't occur is because the Bible isn't literal, and to apply our current day understaning to the historic text creates glaring flaws

I don't think its wrong to have two people love each other and find solace in each other's arms, but there is a slippery slope when you talk about moral decay that collapses societites

Sex is kinda overrated tbh. Same with humanity.

I think humanity is extremely important

otherwise GOD wouldn't of created us

The universe wouldn't even notice if we vanished in an instant.

What is moral decay?
How do we know God created us?

sounds like you believe in the science fiction with many fictional galaxies.

Ok even if the earth were flat

We know GOD created us because the firmament has been proven to exist

How do we know God created us

What I believe doesn't even matter. There is zero proof that we're important. We give things value so we declare ourselves important but it's subjective.

and psalms 19.1 states:

The Koran also speaks of a firmament