Message from @^Kevin^
Discord ID: 498133740069978122
@The18thDoctor yeah u right but the bean monk didn't get it all
we have been manipulated genes in a rudimentary way to create various types of dogs
Yeah I wasn’t just referring to Mendel.
we have a very basic understanding of it
Being able to change genes and understanding how genes work are very, very different things.
and rudimentary is where we are, we are in the 21st century with that limitation on tech, in 1 K years, we will be much much more advanced and have a better understanding of it
We have manipulated genes to grow ears on mice, we have a complex understanding of it
presuming we don't have scientists who create bogus theories that everyone buys
I'm saying we have a rudimentary understanding of it
we don't understand the human brain, we don't understand how to fix DNA defects
Just because you don't know how it works doesn't make it impossible to learn, we know so much but you aren't looking it up
we understand less than we understand
lets presume we know about 2% of how DNA works, your trying to pass that off as a great knowledge
DNA defects are more often than not self correcting in mitosis, however if you are talking about meiosis we can correct there
2% is not alot
less than a slice of a pizza
How do you know it’s that small?
Kevin you aren't reading what I'm saying, you are presuming that you are already correct and saying nonsense
And also knowledge is not a thing you can easily slice up like that. You can’t know how much you don’t know without knowing what you don’t know.
Big Lover, your talking about details of DNA and not paying attention to the bigger picture
You are saying we know nothing about DNA while I explain the details of how much we actually know
I'm not saying we know nothing
I'm saying we know very little compared to what we will know given enough time and not being misdirected
You are ignoting the current understanding in your argument however
in comparison to what we will know in 1,000 years from now, or even 10,000 years from now
We will know more about everting on the future we can't dismiss all knowledge right now
your ignoring that our knowledge on the subject will grow, and that we are in the infancy of our knowledge of it
I'm not dismissing that we know some stuff about it, but we don't know everything or even 5%
if we knew everything, we could do what GOD does, and takes someone's genes and make a person from scratch
no womb, nothing
Kevin what you are saying is that we don't know enough so anything is possible even incest with the tree thing.
I'm saying, this is what we know currently our current extent and the actual future of the subject.
I'm working with speculation based on facts. You are trying to create a fanfiction of biology where you can justify the issue of inbreeding between two people and their children.
no, incest is wrong because it creates negative outcomes in children with genetic defects
I'm saying there was a reason why this didn't occur in the earlier generations and now it does occur
What about gay incest
Between consensual adults
Or incest with contraception
if children can't be created, I'm sure sex is wrong in the eyes of GOD. the whole point of sex is to create offspring.
Ok so is it wrong to have sex with an infertile wife?
The reason it didn't occur is because the Bible isn't literal, and to apply our current day understaning to the historic text creates glaring flaws
I don't think its wrong to have two people love each other and find solace in each other's arms, but there is a slippery slope when you talk about moral decay that collapses societites