Message from @^Kevin^
Discord ID: 498214564111056906
Nope, you're selling bullshit
do some cavendish like this guy did https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QdifwJ31ig
Do you even know how we tested for relativity
Human Sheeple, do you konw what a shill flat earther is?
nothing is stopping you from trying it on your own
i have a 12 ounces of relativity, how much do you need?
@Soldz (CF) You cannot presume an experience of yours will hold up in all cases by experience alone. Every repeatable scientific experiment is thus not valid until it is validated; which lands Science in an infintie regress. Look up David Hume
use metric pls
based on the definition of a shill flat earther, how are you not one?
https://youtu.be/q_e_tT1d0Dw?t=75
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
SO CHRISTMAS BAUBLES HAVE LOTS OF MASSS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA
<:thonk:485324336874651650>
@Toothcake Thats true
You guys are so gullible you think mass attracts mass and you believe that Royal Society Occultish Henry Cavendish in his wooden box OMG I'm dying here
@Soldz (CF) `P H I L O S O P H Y`
@Human Sheeple shhhh they get defencive when you call out there "big" old brains
@Toothcake But if I continue to repeat it in different areas, for example the *curve* like I have I will find out the truth
the cavendish experiment was faulty
@^Kevin^ Mark Sergeant, Patricia Steere, Jacob Vigil, Tyson Miller, Mick West's Dad, basically everybody at FES and Flat Earth Asshole
@Soldz (CF) Perhaps, but couldn't I always ask for more evidence? If you're relying only on that *which you have experienced* any new hypothetical requires a new experience.
Penguin face even admitted he was a shill
others that I can't identify is probably because I haven't been exposed to their nonsense
@Soldz (CF) This is why the Philosophy of Science exists: one has to prove on a non-empirical basis empiricism is justified. Until you can do that, experiments don't mean much.
Look up Metatron
sheeple those are clearly unstable
the steup is wrong
steup
ugh
setup
@Toothcake I'm not only relying on that, no there is much more but you have to remember that if one thing fails in a theory the whole thing could be wrong as well simple as that
Yes
That's why the Problem of Induction is a glaring, problematic hell of a problem.
I suggest you try with proper materials, sheeple
Like you globers just like to reassert already debunked claims about Cavendish, Big G isn't even a constant
stop drifting when you get cornered holy fuck
stop saying BIG G, gravity is not GOD
@Soldz (CF) As far as philosophy-types are concerned, pretty much everything said on this server about math, science, or whatever random lines-shadows or satellites is effectively unjustified nonsense. Solely because Induction. Rise above; be better.
kevin you crack me up
I'm not cornered at ll, you're the one asserting the invisible elastic band holding my feet to a ball shaped floor spinning wobbling twisting tilting oscillating corkscrewing around a burning ball of gas 93 million miles away
GRAVITY