Message from @The18thDoctor

Discord ID: 500353690746748937


2018-10-12 16:30:34 UTC  

it doesn't matter how many observation points

2018-10-12 16:30:42 UTC  

you can have 20

2018-10-12 16:30:50 UTC  

It does. Try it.

2018-10-12 16:31:03 UTC  

I'm not running around doing experiments

2018-10-12 16:31:09 UTC  

you have flat earthers who have already done i

2018-10-12 16:31:18 UTC  

With three observation points?

2018-10-12 16:31:29 UTC  

Or, since you say it still works, 20?

2018-10-12 16:31:37 UTC  

I'll track down and videos

2018-10-12 16:54:36 UTC  

The first video uses one observer, so it's completely flat-out wrong about the whole idea. The second video only uses two observers, so it is again inaccurate.

2018-10-12 16:56:29 UTC  

The reason is that two points can define a line, but you need three to define a plane and four to define space.

2018-10-12 17:04:10 UTC  

your math is wrong

2018-10-12 17:04:37 UTC  

1,2,5

2018-10-12 17:05:35 UTC  

your in geometry class and they are doing other type of math dealing with cosines, tangents, etc

2018-10-12 17:05:44 UTC  

That's geometry.

2018-10-12 17:05:54 UTC  

Trigonometry is a subsection of geometry.

2018-10-12 17:06:15 UTC  

well trig isn't geometry

2018-10-12 17:06:50 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/500353666650210325/unknown.png

2018-10-12 17:06:55 UTC  

It's a branch of geometry.

2018-10-12 17:07:08 UTC  

Read the actual page you took that quote from.

2018-10-12 17:07:29 UTC  

ur trying to say what they are doing is invalid with bad defintions

2018-10-12 17:07:51 UTC  

just because of your lack of the math doesn't invalidate it

2018-10-12 17:07:55 UTC  

No, I'm saying it's inconclusive, since only one or two points are used.

2018-10-12 17:08:06 UTC  

it works with trig

2018-10-12 17:08:20 UTC  

you miss that red rhetoric was the one doing the math for the globe

2018-10-12 17:08:31 UTC  

they took his math and modified it for flat earth

2018-10-12 17:08:40 UTC  

its not even their math, its red rhetorics math

2018-10-12 17:08:47 UTC  

if you don't think it was done right, take it up with red

2018-10-12 17:09:12 UTC  

Yes. They also completely missed the whole point of Red's video.

2018-10-12 17:09:19 UTC  

he's a globe believer

2018-10-12 17:09:31 UTC  

I think u missed the point

2018-10-12 17:09:34 UTC  

doctor, he never actually reads the things he quotes

2018-10-12 17:09:59 UTC  

I watched the videos

2018-10-12 17:10:56 UTC  

he assumes he is right, and uses that to ignore everything else

2018-10-12 17:11:48 UTC  

the basic geometry on day 1 teaches taht you tkae 2 points to draw a line

2018-10-12 17:11:54 UTC  

3 points to define a plane

2018-10-12 17:11:59 UTC  

Red's video was in response to one by Jeranism. In that video, Jeran claimed that the distance and size of the Sun were randomly chosen, and that the only way you could determine the actual distance was by guessing, since scale invariance makes it impossible to tell between a small, close thing and a distant, large thing. Red corrected him by explaining the trigonometry used to calculate the distance to the sun. It had nothing to do with proving the shape of the Earth, it was simply to correct him on his methods.

2018-10-12 17:12:01 UTC  

4 points to definite 3 dimensions

2018-10-12 17:12:18 UTC  

when your dealing with trig they move way beyond that