Message from @kalebdenden
Discord ID: 713875212713852981
It may have something to do with aligning the front sight base with the barrel
seems almost all of their ar components are made for service rifle competition
Basically a high end m16a2 clone with a giant ass bull barrel
Must be something that us normie non-competition types don't need to know about or use
There's a variety of brands that are still extremely good, though maybe not to the absurd quality of cle. Krieger, Douglass, criterion, white oak armament, bartlein
CLE takes blanks from a few of these companies, machines them, attaches a barrel extension, and so on, so they're a bit more expensive
I was eyeing a Brownells 20 inch fluted DMR barrel but their supplier for them seems to only be known for making 6.5 grendel barrels
Faxon also makes good stuff, typically sub moa
Faxon tends to be the best bang for your buck, semi budget barrel
Best camo for this type of environment?
M81 maybe?
Multi cam would probably work ok
M81 I would suggest.
I live in a similar setting.
Rhodesian honestly
Depending on the green of your woods over there
I find in my part of Canada flecktarn works really good but authentic cadpat with the infrared blocking materials are hard to beat
Just dropped our memorial day sale in <#704687682017820753>
Between a 5.56 NATO barrel with a 1:8 twist and a 223 Wylde with a 1:8 would there be any noticible difference in performance with 77gr open tip match ammo
But just in case get .223 wylde
That was the plan
I have been told that 223 wylde is more of a marketing thing than anything
Enlighten me lol
Basically handles 5.56 pressure while providing the tolerance of .223 which aids in accuracy
Not sure how much accuracy, but there’s no downside to it so basically everyone is switching to it
Okay I just had several people tell me it was a way to get people to buy shit they didn't really need. But your explanation does make sense. I should try to see for myself how much it helps accuracy
If you are building a new rifle .223 wylde is preferred but you don't exactly *need* to upgrade all of your barrels
All my rifles that shoot 223/556 are stamped on the barrel with 5.56 even if the reciever says 223
Which the rumour is our government is hesitant to allow rifles with 556 stamped on the reciever to be non restricted. All the Tavors I have handled say 223 on the reciever but have 556 on the barrel
I'm just curious to see how much it can improve accuracy
Hell my HK SL8-4 has 223 rem on the reciever but 556 on the barrel also lol
5.56 and 223 have different sized chamberings. The 223 chamber has a shorter distance before it engages rifling, and when you fire the higher pressured 5.56 through it, it can create dangerous pressure spikes. On the other hand, firing 223 out of a 5.56 chamber, which it's not designed for, means that the round has to travel further before engaging rifling, it causes diminished accuracy. The point of a 223 wylde chamber is that it's somewhere between these two chambers, being long enough not to cause pressure issues with 5.56, but short enough to still be accurate when shooting the cheaper 223 cartridges.
^
Yeah I get that I'm just curious now how much can it improve accuracy
I know the whole dont fire 556 in a 223 only gun
IWI says the Tavor is designed for 556 and they just stamp 223 on the reciever to make it easier to export
It's not so much that 223 wylde improves accuracy, but firing 223 through a 556 chambering reduces accuracy
I just wanna know why so many competition barrels are made in 223 wylde
For the exact reasons allready mentioned