Message from @HonorVirtutisPraemium

Discord ID: 276127604744912896


2017-01-31 23:10:12 UTC  

National Socialism is only 'Socialism' in the Austrian sense.

2017-01-31 23:10:24 UTC  

It's a the same thing

2017-01-31 23:10:35 UTC  

It's the same shit man

2017-01-31 23:10:44 UTC  

Racial paradise socialist workers paradise.

2017-01-31 23:10:47 UTC  

Same crap

2017-01-31 23:10:51 UTC  

Different names.

2017-01-31 23:11:04 UTC  

Different imagined favored people

2017-01-31 23:11:08 UTC  

The idea was never to empower the workers.

2017-01-31 23:11:33 UTC  

The goal was to take their livelihoods - their work and the only form of life in Liberalism - and use that as a means to reform them into whatever was pleased.

2017-01-31 23:11:46 UTC  

No the point of communism is not to empower the people.

2017-01-31 23:11:51 UTC  

If Liberalism has made the economic all that matters in life then subjugating the economic allows you to put life under your control.

2017-01-31 23:11:59 UTC  

National Socialism/Fascism, I'm saying.

2017-01-31 23:12:00 UTC  

Read why Lenin thought he was democratic

2017-01-31 23:12:04 UTC  

I am not discussing Socialism.

2017-01-31 23:12:07 UTC  

Leninist democracy

2017-01-31 23:12:13 UTC  

Facsism is not Socialism 😐

2017-01-31 23:12:14 UTC  

Is Bolshevism

2017-01-31 23:12:23 UTC  

It is communism by another name.

2017-01-31 23:12:27 UTC  

In practice.

2017-01-31 23:12:29 UTC  

Mate.

2017-01-31 23:12:31 UTC  

It's really not.

2017-01-31 23:12:31 UTC  

Whee it has lasted.

2017-01-31 23:12:33 UTC  

There are huge differences.

2017-01-31 23:12:45 UTC  

You're under the fallacy they viewed Liberals under: all things are economic.

2017-01-31 23:12:48 UTC  

There are very few differenxxea.

2017-01-31 23:12:56 UTC  

Very few? Are you serious?

2017-01-31 23:12:59 UTC  

Yea

2017-01-31 23:13:07 UTC  

Define that or at least justify it.

2017-01-31 23:13:36 UTC  

Communist and Fascist economies tend not to last very long.

2017-01-31 23:13:49 UTC  

This does not justify your statement and it again falls into the economics-only trap.

2017-01-31 23:13:49 UTC  

They mostly resort to the same shit.

2017-01-31 23:13:53 UTC  

What same shit?

2017-01-31 23:13:54 UTC  

After they collapse

2017-01-31 23:13:56 UTC  

What collapse?

2017-01-31 23:14:06 UTC  

They all have collapsed

2017-01-31 23:14:09 UTC  

Did *any* Fascist economy collapse, or did the state itself?

2017-01-31 23:14:11 UTC  

None has lasted.

2017-01-31 23:14:17 UTC  

Mate, you are not justifying your points.

2017-01-31 23:14:34 UTC  

You said Communism and Fascism have very few differences. How?

2017-01-31 23:14:47 UTC  

And, I oblige you to not act a Liberal in defining your reasoning.

2017-01-31 23:14:51 UTC  

@HonorVirtutisPraemium Also in the sense of wealth redistribution, distritbutionist values (which aren't really that confaltable and were quite ancient in European common law) and culturally liberal ideas that relaxed certain values for the sake of making more Germans. Further, the word socialism was also used to differentiate Germany from Russia and its communism. They liked the general idea of larger government to replace the Kaizer AND Weimar and they liked the idea of a safety net due to a weak economy.