Message from @Gil O'Teen

Discord ID: 277238465106804736


2017-02-04 00:40:07 UTC  

THEY ARE PERFECT FOR LOUNGING

2017-02-04 00:40:12 UTC  

OR BEATING UP THE FALSE

2017-02-04 00:40:13 UTC  

SO

2017-02-04 00:40:16 UTC  

PERFECT FOR DAILY WEAR.

2017-02-04 00:40:38 UTC  

By that standard I dress dapper AF

2017-02-04 00:40:42 UTC  

male bottoms in the old tims actually were as loose and comfortable as track suits

2017-02-04 00:40:59 UTC  

pants were pretty much derived from riding uniforms no ?

2017-02-04 00:41:11 UTC  

@diversity_is_racism that whole "how the Slavic culture defeated firefox" thing went right over my head.

2017-02-04 00:41:16 UTC  

peasants always wore comfy clothing

2017-02-04 00:41:28 UTC  

That's cuz they're peasants.

2017-02-04 00:41:34 UTC  

yes

2017-02-04 00:41:44 UTC  

If it doesn't pinch it doesn't look good.

2017-02-04 00:41:59 UTC  

Women included.

2017-02-04 00:42:40 UTC  

yes though peasant women of old would wear white shirts when working on their daily duties, untying them to loosen them when it becomes to hot

2017-02-04 00:42:57 UTC  

Damn...

2017-02-04 00:43:04 UTC  

and their jiggly boobies would be all around, thats how fertility was so high those days

2017-02-04 00:43:48 UTC  

I am sold.

2017-02-04 00:44:07 UTC  

That's what she said, incidentally.

2017-02-04 00:46:17 UTC  

but peasants were pretty ugly tbh

2017-02-04 00:46:20 UTC  

in those days

2017-02-04 00:46:40 UTC  

what'd you say about my grandma?

2017-02-04 00:46:52 UTC  

only aristocracy was beautiful and fatalistic in love

2017-02-04 00:47:13 UTC  

hey i don't shoot me

2017-02-04 00:47:21 UTC  

Live fast and die forever young one.

2017-02-04 00:47:25 UTC  

my ancestors were all shepherds peasants and rebels

2017-02-04 00:47:52 UTC  

Though the oldest ancestor on my mother's side was some kind of prince methinks

2017-02-04 00:47:59 UTC  

but that was like 700 years ago

2017-02-04 00:48:59 UTC  

I think most families have similar stories. I don't know what's big talking family myths and what's an actual hit on the ancestry.com. But hey, many kingships fell and many regals and nobles really got some tail.

2017-02-04 00:49:55 UTC  

it doesn't matter. you are your ancestors.

2017-02-04 00:50:04 UTC  

i can be pretty much sure until the 18th century as far as my father's family tree goes

2017-02-04 00:50:28 UTC  

because it's a seriously and objectivelly collected, and the area they settled was quite small and compact, easy to assemble

2017-02-04 00:50:47 UTC  

all people known etc

2017-02-04 00:50:56 UTC  

but beyond that everything is shady and unknown

2017-02-04 00:51:59 UTC  

Same here, actually. Past that point into the past, I don't even know if I can trust some random databases associations anymore.

2017-02-04 00:53:56 UTC  

genealogy/dna tests are only good for finding out if you have something unpleasant in there. that's why i got mine. had to put to bed this fucking native american ancestor rumour that i'm sure many of you are familiar with. also wanted to see if i echoed at all (i don't)

2017-02-04 00:55:32 UTC  

im kinda not interested in paying for that since i think chances are very slim that i have foreign blood

2017-02-04 00:55:52 UTC  

obviously, coming from SE Europe DNA would probably show general mix of this area

2017-02-04 00:56:06 UTC  

yeah don't bother unless you have some annoying boomers constantly telling you your grandpa fucked a feather

2017-02-04 00:56:40 UTC  

But up until 20th century this was a very secluded area, where peple would marry into a village next door

2017-02-04 00:56:44 UTC  

@Gil O'Teen 3/4 OF AMERIND ADMIXTURE STORIES AMONG WHITES ARE 100% NONSENSE

2017-02-04 00:56:51 UTC  

LIKE, PEOPLE SAID THIS STUFF TO SEEM COOL IN THE DAY