Message from @The Enlightened Shepherd
Discord ID: 277245327289876481
By way of being 1/16th amerindian.
But a mixture that happened like 10.000 years ago and more ?
But in general, caucasoid people
But for a small area quite many subtypes, most notable being Dinaric
Time balances things. Also, the majority of admixture was from Turks, who are a Keltoi/Kartvelian people and they never interbred with the Arabs. That was a part of the reason for their Muslim monarchs seizing power.
You mean in the Balkans ?
Yes,
Thats what most people get wrong
In general genetic picture, Turks as an appearance were of little relevance
The Asian link that supposedly exists in Europe from Atlantic to Baltic within the so called Alpine race
Comes from both Anadolia, Iran and areas around Caucaus and Caspian lake
And Asia proper around Caspian lake as well
And it was a slow and steady process
It never happens within an occupation or sth like that
People forget that Whites lived in Anadolia for long and communicated freely with European mainland
And they ame into contacts with people of those arias and transfered genes westwards towards Aegean sea
and these slowly transfered them westwards still
it doesnt go like INVADE DOMINATE IMPREGNATE - DONE !
preciselly because of what you described earlier
Same for Aryans that lived in Central Asia and around Black Sea, Scythians for example
And also with Iranians who on their part, as Aryan people, were in more direct contact with semites and asians
And people believe that Slavic people actually came from preciselly populations around Black Sea such as Scythians
@Gil O'Teen tripe.
@The Enlightened Shepherd From what I understand, the Anatolians were very closely related to the Keltoi (Celts in Britain) and the Hallas. They were slowly swallowed up and split between what became the Turks and what became the Assyrians, who then collapsed under their own weight. Also, I thought the Alpine were a kind of Germanic post-Gothic genetic cluster in the alps.
Depends on who you ask
Some people believe Alpine race is an imaginary concept
Grant says Alpine people are caucasoid people who had genetic influence from Asians
i believe in little more complicated classificaton, but Grants beliefs in Asian link are IMO reasonable
I remember reading (it was from the people who introduced the terms Red and White Nordic) that the Anatolians came from what is modern Western China and the majority of modern East Asians are remnants of the pre/proto Anatolian peoples bred with Denisovans.
Like how we bred with neanderthal.
I don't believe whatsoever in presence of African blood in pre-modern Europe as some claim
Since evidence is just unsurmountable that negro blood is physicaly very invasive and incompatible with statehood and order
Not to mention that Negro was the world's worst traveller and explorer ever
Me either. More on that topic, it was asserted by my sources that I mentioned before that the peoples who became the Anatolians became the likes of Carthaginians, various semites (because of later interbreeding with slaves) and the majority of North Africa's history was a White/Red Nordic affair. They just branched off and spread out because of their numbers.
The Anatolians were just one group from the emigre.
Carthagians were Phoenicians but i believe that lines between them, and White North Afrians such as Berbers was thin
North Africa was dominaed by Whites probably for tens of thousands of years
50|>0/\/\123 7#3 \/\/34|
Judging by how White genes are so recessive, I imagine that North Africa was like predominately White at those days
Since even in this late hour you have so many obviously White people among Berbers