The intelligibility of our perceptions of a layer accessible to us of what unbeknowst to us is a multilayered universe would mean an incomplete understanding but not a baseless one.
you see it as solid, you can reach for it, pick it up but you're not seeing it for what it is. Out there is just an inconceivable matrix of probability feilds and ripples.
You see a ball, you reach for it, you pick it up, you smell it, you bounce it around, you hear what it sounds like when bounced, but you're in fact blind and so are missing what it looks like.
Look at your hand. What you see is constructed out of bits of data memory and hardwired patterns. You can feel your hand too which is born of the same sort of thing. Then wiggle your fingers a bit. That bit of intention isn't a representation at all.
You might call that consciousness which watched through your eyes and feels. You don't experience it. In fact the only time you are conscious of anything is when it resists your will. You don't feel anything with your hand unless something resists it. You don't see anything with your eyes until you can't see through something.
Which means that consciousness isn't fundamental since it obviously depends on something else to be conscious of anything.
