Message from @Exilarch

Discord ID: 286560914445041664


2017-03-01 18:08:05 UTC  

Let them do mma and paintball and intellectual stuff and art and let them have lots of kids

2017-03-01 18:08:13 UTC  

And eat organic food

2017-03-01 18:08:20 UTC  

Hold on

2017-03-01 18:08:20 UTC  

Ok Shepherd

2017-03-01 18:08:25 UTC  

We are talking about decision making

2017-03-01 18:08:35 UTC  

MOST PEOPLE ARE HAMSTERS

2017-03-01 18:08:37 UTC  

And anything that involves you being given shit to do

2017-03-01 18:08:40 UTC  

HOW DO WE BREED THEM OUT?

2017-03-01 18:08:49 UTC  

Just by doing those things and being healthy aryans, they have their shit together and make invaluable contributions

2017-03-01 18:08:56 UTC  

It's okay to have some friendly retards who can show up and do simple things

2017-03-01 18:08:58 UTC  

like being technicians

2017-03-01 18:09:07 UTC  

It's a caste, you know. The shudra people

2017-03-01 18:09:07 UTC  

@diversity_is_racism The debate is whether people should be subsidized just because they conform or posses the right appearance (being blonde and blue eyed)

2017-03-01 18:09:16 UTC  

But they have to be guided and they can't be leaders

2017-03-01 18:09:34 UTC  

Subsidize them more for having talents and breeding

2017-03-01 18:09:50 UTC  

Pleasing appearance isn't high on the list of traits to breed for, but it's nice if people look good

2017-03-01 18:09:59 UTC  

It's okay to have it count for a tiny bit.

2017-03-01 18:10:31 UTC  

All that even matters in life are athletics, violence, art and eugenics. What, do they need to invent better dildo designs or they are worthless? More growth! More Progress! Muh GDP!

2017-03-01 18:10:34 UTC  

@Exilarch Why ? Above all, why would higher classes subsidize anyone they don't personally want to in the first place ?

2017-03-01 18:10:37 UTC  

It's better for everyone, if everyone looks better

2017-03-01 18:10:46 UTC  

YES

2017-03-01 18:11:00 UTC  

I barely even like whites beyond appearance

2017-03-01 18:11:09 UTC  

For example, i can introduce an eugenic program to import lets say Nordic people to here where I live

2017-03-01 18:11:15 UTC  

I just hate uglies more

2017-03-01 18:11:16 UTC  

But the point of everything is SELECTION

2017-03-01 18:11:29 UTC  

Catherine the Great imported German *farmers*

2017-03-01 18:11:42 UTC  

Populations always practice selection on themselves. Sexual selection is the most common example of this

2017-03-01 18:11:45 UTC  

So?

2017-03-01 18:11:47 UTC  

Sometimes they select for useless traits like a fancy feather

2017-03-01 18:11:47 UTC  

She didn't import them for merely breathin in oxygen, but because she wanted their *performance*

2017-03-01 18:11:56 UTC  

The problem is that humanity is practicing poor selection pressures now

2017-03-01 18:12:00 UTC  

We're not selecting for good things

2017-03-01 18:12:01 UTC  

Jerb = value of your life

2017-03-01 18:12:09 UTC  

And even worse than that, we are selecting against certain virtues actively

2017-03-01 18:12:20 UTC  

She didn't import German peopel to Volga area to breed and exist, but to *cultivate it* throuhg agriculture

2017-03-01 18:12:29 UTC  

So she didn't import Nordic intellectuals, but *doers*

2017-03-01 18:12:31 UTC  

"Cultivate"

2017-03-01 18:12:46 UTC  

Lets not get into environmental debates

2017-03-01 18:12:54 UTC  

Did the natural landscape and ecosystem become healthier for it?

2017-03-01 18:13:15 UTC  

Catherine the Dalit

2017-03-01 18:13:28 UTC  

So my point is, subsidizing ANY people, including Nordics for merely existing is an insult to nature