is what he says still true? Sure

but the intent shifts the frame a bit

that's how one should look at Wolves of Vinland for example

JD is a brainy, faggy, church of satan kind of dude who wants to larp being a nazi biker

the key is "I basically fuck men like they are women"

this psychology among gay men manifests as stereotypically "masculine" behaviour

hating femininity/perceived weakness

The point is

ready to beat the shit out of sissy boys (but as part of a sexual fanasy)

Jack could be subconciouslly manipulative of people he associates with

But in the end, I don't think he is disshonest

No dont misunderstand me

After all, he went after everything he preaches pretty much

I'm not saying he has a bad faith approach

And I agree with things he says

I'm saying one should see his ideas in the perspective of what he is as well as taking them at face value

He is perhaps the rare Anglo/Nordic guy who has a perspective on realities of sex relatons, probably thanks to being gay

However

Well now here, I have my main dispute

this is the number 1 topic on which caution should be practiced

I still do, and always will keep with my faith of never trusting gay people

when he is being more general, he is fine

Gay people are chronically and perpetually untrusthworthy and slippery

no pun intended

Unhappy I would have said

So the farthest i can go is to say that i agree with his thoughts

gay ppl

anyway, need to get to work, bai

I mean gay males

got no reason

gay ppl

got no reason

Nordic people in general cannot imagine their lives without a woman occupying a position of power or control. Therefore even if they switch to the most right wing ideology there is, they still give a woman such a role, subconciously

They will at the same time bash feminism and practice viking coastline raids larps, while catering o the whims of their females

It's thousands of years of such a conditioning which was propagated to the extremes through Protestantism and just won't go away

That seems strange to me. Not doubting the fact, but applied to my life it seems inconceivable in many ways.

Thought: evalion is less mother f kalki and more mystery babylon

you and evalion have a nice thing going for you it seems

❤ <:nazi_flag:286647190388998160> ❤

Back to JD - I think that's a shortcoming of many folks: take both the author and content in to consideration on the material rather than absorbing and jumping off from there to synthesize new concepts. Considering the source is exactly what the ignorati do with "literally Hitler"

Basically taking things as standalone as gospel or not being a binary choice for consideration is just dumb.