Message from @The Enlightened Shepherd
Discord ID: 297860638590631937
I wonder, was the removal of the Turks in the Balkans a positive consequence of 1789 ideas or was it the result of something else?
KIM PHILBY = STALIN'S REVENGE ON UK
Removal of Turks was imminent
In fact, it's miraculous how Turks persisted for so long
Mostly thanks to British support
And Austrian caution towards Russia
But otherwise, Ottoman position was incredibly fragile and perilous
They pesisted only thanks to cunning in diplomacy, in their good fashion
The fact that it was defeated by Balkan League,and alliance of conscripted peasant armies, displayed how completely sub-standard was Ottoman force
It's society, the Muslim population, was weakened, soft, dwelled in towns, markets and dealed solely with trade and craft
It's officer corps drafted from that population, corrupt, ambitious, selfish and unpatriotic
Turkey rallied only in WW I
to become much better force
did the British supplied equipments? at that times the Ottoman were mostly agrarians
AFAIK Turks used mostly French and German equipment
But they had considerable manpower, and long history of conflict and experienced officer corps
How average Mormon looks like
lame shirt that doesnt fit, on a lame physique, tucked into pants that dont fit, tied with a waist that doesnt fit
and betraying country
I think that city living is anti-human, city-dwellers know nothing else than cities, and every cities of the world are the same, this is how you kill allegiance and you end up with males with gay haircuts and tight jeans, this is why I think infrastructures are more dangerous than ideology, they built themselves an universe removed from the world
@Salt I agree and have been trying to get prozak to understand for years
Westerners think their happiness is one purchase away
That's what all boils down to
No identity
No real values or loyalties, only imagined stuff
They imagine what they value but in reality are as water, dissapearing without trace facing any trial or test
They refuse the only and most logical option that can improve them vastly
And that is to limit their options
Limit the number of people they are loyal to, number of things they own, number of things they obey and consider sacred
Number of people they interact with, number of things they are prepared to vouch for, number of things which they are prepared to defend to the end
They always have to be committed to cosmopolianism, because otherwise they feel as if somebody is "denying" them something
As if they have to give up on this Ecumene which belongs to them, when in reality only thing they have to do is take charge of their own lives
And assume realistic attitude towards their environment
I am only happy when asserting my identity
Basically people are mentally healthiest when asserting collective identity, and when times are too broken for that they default to personal identity instead