Message from @Deleted User 57835c2c
Discord ID: 298079080035778570
Out of every Mohammed will step a Jefferson or Washington, and out of every Nguyen, a Hamilton or Roosevelt.
kk
http://i.imgur.com/CfOgok0.gifv
pictured: powerlifting internet defense force
@Deleted User 57835c2c what do you think of this?
[–]BR0THAKYLE 773 points 2 months ago
CPS does not want to take your kids. This image alone was probably just a talking to. Whatever else CPS found when they went to investigate, it was enough for the courts to decide to remove the child from the home.
Source: wife works CPS.
permalinkembedparent
[–]socialworker80 241 points 2 months ago
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I personally don't like that you made such a specific judgement call about the safety of children and the child welfare field, citing your source as "wife works CPS". I worked for CPS for 10 years, and in no way think my husband is qualified to make such a call because he is my husband. Being my husband does not automatically mean that he has working knowledge of a job that is often very complex by nature, balances the civil with the criminal, and is governed by countless policies. I mainly say this because I have seen so many misconceptions floating around Reddit concerning child welfare, and always by people who don't do the job. It struck a nerve that you downplayed the seriousness of a parent transporting a child of this age without a car seat, when said parent is so blatantly thumbing their nose at car seat laws and child safety all with an air of this being a regular occurrence. If this was my report to investigate, if the child stayed in the home you can guarantee that a case for supervision would have been opened. But in all honesty due to the age of the child and obvious safety concerns I would have removed the child until the parent could have attended parenting classes. That being said, thank you for recognizing that CPS does not WANT to take kids. Because we don't. We do so to keep children safe. I hope that my "rant" has not offended you.
permalinkembedparent
sry about that @Mother lol
false alarm but still close
SO WHY DON'T THEY GET BETTER JOBS?
http://fortune.com/2017/03/30/rent-black-hispanic-neighborhoods/
Symbolic
this gave me PTSD
youre a slut
true
@Death Strike's Bat Better jobs or relocate to a better market.
Lol
this is why I am not sending any of my children to college
it is full of marxist transbrowns
a bunch of quadroons mad at SJWs for promoting racial equality
today I am putting soy milk in my chai
unsweetened soy milk
normal retards love normal milk so they probably did something to it
yeah @Deleted User 57835c2c the chattering depraved elite classes promoted low fat milk and milk alternatives that were explicitly feminizing while the fats in milk keep one energized, keep you sated and make you lean and strong. The propaganda didn't take very well, so normals still by and large prefer full fat milk, one aspect of a traditional existence that has not yet been fully co-opted. You have misread the signs as usual and tossed the baby right out with the bath water (soy milk).
goymilk
brahmins drank full fat milk
normal milk is shitty, raw milk is good but impossible to get
throughout their existence
yes they drank full fat raw milk
from pastured animals
if anything is well attested about them, it's this
not tit juice from sickly wretched creatures living their whole lives in an auschwitz gas chamber
in the UK, the milk I drink comes straight from the teat, fresh
in america that sort of milk is illegal
in Pakistan, the same
I suppose I should drink the factory milk, to be manlybaconbeard?
but some dudes would add water to their milk
so you had to find a good fellow
literally just dudes who had cows, somewhere to graze them and a motorcycle to make deliveries on