capitalism does nothing to protect against managerialism, and in fact prozak's aristocracy is essentially planning managerialism from the start

IT IS BASIC HUMAN TENDENCY TO EXCLUDE THOSE WHO ARE NOT EASY WINS

AN EASY WIN IS WHOEVER GETS ALONG WITH THE GROUP

HOW IS GROUP DEFINED? BY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, EQUAL RIGHTS, ETC.

AND BY OFFICIAL MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND LICENSING

THUS YOU CREATE A MONOPOLY

AND HAND IT TO INCOMPETENTS

WHOSE ONLY REAL GOAL IS TO AVOID INFRINGING ON REGULATIONS

CAPITALISM IS THE OPPOSITE OF THAT

WHERE YOU ARE RIGHT: WE NEED MORE THAN AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM

THEN YOU GET IT WRONG

AND DECIDE THAT SOCIALISM WILL BE A PERFECT SYSTEM

nazi socialism was great

meanings are bigger than words, that's why you have to be rigorous with them and make sure you are on the same page with someone else

until your favorite eurasians and homosexual tea sippers ruined it

otherwise you end up arguing about the words

and not the meaning

The point with Mandarin conformity is that it was being built throug culture to work from bottom up

not other way arund

But Western mind cannot comprehend that, because Western mind only thinks in terms of mechanisms

There has to be a working formula on how to generate conformity

And if it doesnt exists, as it does not, then we will pretend it does

Like psychology for example

And since Westernism is all about joining the discourse and not asking questions, especially if they are concerned with long term outcomes

Then there are apparently no problems

People always forget how crazy things the West has performed in it's past

For 50 years treatment of psychically ill people all over west was being arranged according to a completely insane theory

they were being electrocuted and and psychiatriss all over tried to find out whether you have family inherited incestual sexual envy

its not completely insane, that

current psychiatry is just as bad really

in some ways, worse

current psychiatry is only good because it failed, so it doesn't attempt to contribute to the problem

well I wont derail you

then think about Behaviorism

with going down that track

It has to be the most stubborn and dogmatical surrender to worship of quantity in western scientific discourse

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/what-is-education.html

Hey prozak, what are you going to do about the fact that under capitalism everyone has a cost incentive to undercut and to deliver the cheapest, shoddiest product they can get away with? What is your traditionalist capitalism fix for the fact that food companies are incentivized to feed you dyed corn syrup instead of food, because it is vastly cheaper? How will market dynamics plus whatever interventions you propose fix that?

you're not accounting for the quality of the product delivered, what people are willing to accept, forces that act to enforce quality etc.

why would a traditionalist state regulated by culture etc. not be liable to be sold 10,000 hamburgers that are half soy?

de-industrialize food production