Message from @UOC
Discord ID: 301009958089129984
#PWNT
@diversity_is_racism about this ann sterzinger affair - women + new york = fail
@The Enlightened Shepherd THAT ARTICLE WAS DEPRESSING AS HECK
NEW YORK IS EVIL HOWEVER
mentally ill people are depressing as hell
but that's how consequences look like
they present themselves abstractly and indirectly
SEEMS CORRECT TO ME
IT TAKES TIME FROM CAUSE TO EFFECT
AND PEOPLE PRESENT THEMSELVES AS SINGULAR OBJECTS, COMPOSED AND PURPOSEFUL
ONLY AFTER EXPERIENCE DO THE CRACKS EMERGE
lonely people in big citties
it's only a matter of waiting long enough
one good thing about Stormfront is that it often uses better and more complete sources for it's claims than Wikipedia
I have been thinking long and hard about Trump’s move and there is one scenario that makes the most sense to me.
Already starting in the early 2000s, serveral high-profile politicians (including Merkel) made public statements about how multiculturalism was a failure. What we are seeing in Syria (and other countires in the region) may be part of a long-term plan to end multiculturalism in Europe. Let me explain why.
With 50 million muslims living in Europe and their high fertility rate you cannot out-wait the problem, something has to happen. Deporations are needed, but departations are inconceivable in a liberal democracy. What is needed is a crisis that will make even the most die-hard antifa activist shut up about how “nobody is illegal” and “refugees are welcome here”. The easiest way to do that would be to flod Europe with refugees and wait till TSHF. That may have been the reason behind Merkel’s non-sense move to open the German borders and invite the whole world in. At this point we are waiting for the situation to get worse and worse (and it is getting worse every day).
Trump was propably not in on this plan, but surely he was briefed after he took office. He was now confronted with the decision to 1) worsen the situation by bombing Syria or 2) to ease the situation by sticking to his non-interventionist foreign policy. He took option 1) what means more instability, more refugees and more chaos in Syria and in Europe.
If this scenaro plays out, we shall see more terror on the streets of Europe every day (a given) and finally a huge terror attack that makes everyone in Europe agree that multiculturalism has failed and drastic measures are necessary.
I do not expect anyone here to agree with me, it is a long shot. But I think it is a reasonable scenario and one should keep it in mind and check whether we keep moving along the script.
=
A quote not my writing
@Nester You know that feeling when somebody offers you free shit and you put that cheerful expression on your face, but deep down you know something isn't right
@Nester Well that's how one must feel when he sees stuff like Trump's bombing of Syria or Swedish government saying how they suddenly think "Immigration should be somewhat stopped"
"Immigration brough us problems" in their language means "Instead of importing 5 million niggers a year, we will import 2 million"
National Exilarchian Nutri-Fascism
can anyone ban pls
whats that mean
PURGE
HAS OCCURRED
FECES
DEPORTED
wew
fkn asswipe
Charles fuck of
off
Fuck off and trip onto an HIV pos swarthy penis
sorry @sampletext it seems some POC interrupted us. We were discussing frozak's sand demon status
sly because:
you read everything
and you reward (in a half ironic fashion?) comments after the fact that you approve of
@sampletext is this the @CharlesMartel you were referring?
creating a sort of pavlovian response, maybe not deliberately
@Mother UR MOTHER