they spoke indo-eruropean languag very similar to greek and russian

no, Aryan

why

central asia *

they praciced an indo-european religion

@fallot are you lighter than my box from amazon?

def

I've got a box from amazon right here

their gods shared names with many indo-european gods

I'm way lighter

they definitely were not the brahmins of the Manusmriti, which serves as the basis of much of this reduction of the social organization of the Indo-Aryans

that is a late text

@fallot do you have brown eyes?

Exilarch will convert to my school of asceticism eventually

yeah

@fallot you are a dalit

no, dalits are different

reasonably speaking, I'm from the most northwestern part of ancient India before you get Pathans

so if any remnant of the ancestral north indian population exists

I am more likely than not to carry it

@fallot what does ur 23 and me say?

haven't done it

not sure I will

@fallot why not?

Brahmans in India were Indo-European people and civilization

That's a fact

I'm not sure if I trust an organization like that with my DNA data

And so was Iran

it's a lot of information

@fallot what could happen?

Brahmins is a term that spans a wide swathe of history

it includes the Indo-Aryan people

but it also includes later settlement in India

We are speaking of Vedic civilization

after a merger with the Ancestral South Indian population

the Brahmin of the Rigved is more ritual priest

with the Kshatriya being the dominant, king class

Has anyone not bothered to ask the obvious question: why should anyone care who the Brahmins were and what they thought?

@stankpüs#3835 is dalit

he's very persistent

engagement is my only option