natural selection gave new guinea negros 59IQ

You're much more than a troll.

@Nester SO WHY ISN'T SACRAMENTUM ACCEPTED AS CANON INSTEAD OF DISSECTION?

dalits, @diversity_is_racism

That's the answer to everything.

it would be much smarter to selectively sterilize the best, healthiest and most moral dalits as they make virtue itself worse by having it

@Nester IT SEEMS TO ME THAT DISSECTION WAS MORE ROCK-LIKE AND THUS MORE COMPREHENSIBLE

AND YET

THE AUDIENCE THEN

WAS MOSTLY MIDDLE CLASS KIDS

@Deleted User 57835c2c ONLY IF YOU WANT THEM AS A PERMANENT SLAVE POPULATION

NATURE'S SOLUTION: MAKE BETTER DALITS, HAVE THEM KILL OFF THE REST AND TAKE THEIR WOMEN

I don't want them around at all

RESULT IS THAT OVER 100K YEARS, THEY SLOWLY MOVE UPWARD TOWARD KSHATRIYA STATUS

Yeah. Dissection was shallower, all around the place, and earlier.

they would make kshatriya worse

@Deleted User 57835c2c LOOK AT THE BELL CURVE

The sacred and the profane

THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION WILL ALWAYS APPEAR

Sacramentum and Dissection

what you are explaining is more simplistic than what I am saying

this is not an issue of mathematics

@Nester I AGREE. SACRAMENTUM IS JUST FANTASTIC. DISSECTION IS FUN AND SOMNOLENT.

this is an issue of qualitative differences

@Deleted User 57835c2c IT IS AN ISSUE OF MATHEMATICS

a brahmin is not a high functioning dalit

THERE WILL ALWAYS BE DALITS OF SOME FORM

SO ALLOW NATURAL SELECTION TO DO ITS WORK

natural selection made a mistake

A BRAHMIN IS WHAT EVOLUTION SHAPED FROM A DALIT OVER 10,000 ITERATIONS

no it isn't

NATURAL SELECTION DOES NOT MAKE MISTAKES

MANKIND DOES

Eventual improvement across millennia

Makes sense tbh

donut

a brahmin was a totally different race from an original dalit

@fallot THE SACRED AND THE PROFANE... I CAN SEE THE APPEAL OF THIS THESIS. YOU SHOULD WRITE IT FOR DMU.

I'll consider it, I'm not sure Sacramentum needs to be compared to Dissection

CASTES OCCUR WITHIN A RACE

@fallot THE COMPARISON IS INHERENT. ALSO MIGHT INCLUDE SENTENCED.