Message from @gohan

Discord ID: 549076120121638912


2019-02-24 03:43:33 UTC  

There's two systems, which collectively fall under "RCS"

2019-02-24 03:43:58 UTC  

RCS stands for "Reaction Control System"

2019-02-24 03:44:37 UTC  

The two types of RCS control are directional thrusters and reaction wheels

2019-02-24 03:45:07 UTC  

Directional thrusters are the most commonly used.
Did you learn about vectors in math?

2019-02-24 03:45:19 UTC  

Knowing basic vector calculations helps to visualize this

2019-02-24 03:46:44 UTC  

Reaction wheels are used to spin the spacecraft along the longer axis, while RCS thrusters are used to translate and rotate the spacecraft along the other axes

2019-02-24 03:46:46 UTC  

Ok. I got what you’re saying. In order to propel a heavy space vehicle in a vacuum requires an incredible force...especially as there is nothing to push against. Agreed?

2019-02-24 03:47:02 UTC  

Not an incredible force, just a force in general

2019-02-24 03:47:48 UTC  

The "nothing to push against" doesn't matter here, as the rocket engine is a self contained system. The fuel being ejected out the back is why the rocket moves forwards.

2019-02-24 03:48:55 UTC  

How much fuel is needed to lift off from earth, carry that craft to the moon (bearing the weight of a Land Rover, btw), landing successfully, taking off again and coming back to earth?

2019-02-24 03:49:15 UTC  

It depends on the type of fuel used, and the engines used in each stage

2019-02-24 03:50:07 UTC  

For example, Ion engines use Xenon gas, while conventional rockets tend to use kerosene, or a mixture of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen.

2019-02-24 03:50:20 UTC  

Certain boosters also use solid fuel, but those are mainly for support

2019-02-24 03:50:49 UTC  

So how much fuel is needed?

2019-02-24 03:50:59 UTC  

In this instance

2019-02-24 03:51:03 UTC  

It depends on the kind of fuel. What mission do you want to analyze?

2019-02-24 03:51:12 UTC  

The engine efficiencies matter as well

2019-02-24 03:51:16 UTC  

First moon landing

2019-02-24 03:51:25 UTC  

There's a reason people say "this isn't rocket science"

2019-02-24 03:51:31 UTC  

It's complex stuff

2019-02-24 03:52:28 UTC  

And even the tiniest change can throw off everything. Case in point, the Challenger Shuttle disaster. The entire shuttle blew up because a singular rubber ring cracked, because it was slightly too cold that morning.

2019-02-24 03:53:02 UTC  
2019-02-24 03:53:24 UTC  

My friend posted this I’m no longer friends with them

2019-02-24 03:53:47 UTC  

🤔

2019-02-24 03:54:05 UTC  

||*Riiiiiiiiiiight*||

2019-02-24 03:54:17 UTC  

Lol jk have a nice day

2019-02-24 03:54:23 UTC  

😂

2019-02-24 03:55:05 UTC  

Don’t worry about it, man, just try not to troll the mods.

2019-02-24 03:55:21 UTC  

K

2019-02-24 03:55:55 UTC  

@Dusty Garlic I have taken your image posting privileges away.

2019-02-24 03:56:01 UTC  

K

2019-02-24 03:56:06 UTC  

Lol

2019-02-24 03:56:23 UTC  
2019-02-24 03:56:24 UTC  

Dusty Garlic#5920 (294743497028665346) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>

2019-02-24 03:57:08 UTC  

Shoot, what did he say, I didn’t get to see it?

2019-02-24 03:57:34 UTC  

He claimed to be s flat earther

2019-02-24 03:57:43 UTC  

Oh, that’s it? Eh

2019-02-24 03:57:46 UTC  

Then posts shit like that

2019-02-24 03:57:52 UTC  

He’s a troll

2019-02-24 03:57:53 UTC  

Oh, nvm, lol

2019-02-24 03:58:02 UTC  

In total, for the Saturn V rocket