dunno, would appreciate something there too but didn't want to muddy it

wanted to just stick to high/low axis

You could say that striving towards permanent, non-transitory states would mark the typical Aristocratic outlook

The best example would be posture

I mean physical posture

Typical Aristocrat when he walks the street

permanence suffices?

Doesn't give away the signs of irrational activity

He doesn't walk too fast or too slow, doesn't look left and right, doesn't check out every passenger every billboard every event

can you make aristocratic transcendental faggotry @The Enlightened Shepherd

He keeps his head straight etc

is this possible

yeah fallot tear this shit up

no way

TES just a protip, there are details that matter and details that don't, I suggest dividing your aristocratic idea into those

I just wanna know how you can say something is "higher" (though of course I accept there is such a thing)

how Lord Flufflebottom walks on the street is not as important as who he puts on pikes and why

Well

I don't think you are exactly right

I mean

yeah, you're wrong

I'm speaking about ideals

there would be a way to walk perfectly

an ideal yes

This is merely ideal-typic picture

Yes

but now

we must say why that ideal is ideal fallot

What is it's primary, underlying characteristic

ancient aryans microanalyzed everything and tried to figure out the best way to do it

don't you think the idea of "walking perfectly" is burying an assumption about purpose

yeah, hence my questionns

I have put forward an explanation

permanence?

lack of transition?

on one hand it's silly as how you walk depends where you're going and under what circumstances, it's functional

the ideal is not rigid

That it is the lack of irrational, or further, much lower dependence on psychic and physical influences and their imperatives

on the other hand the concept of the importance of graceful behavior is good

absence of something does not suffice as an answer

so, rational, removed from emotion?