Message from @fallot

Discord ID: 329666628675436545


2017-06-28 16:53:25 UTC  

however my God makes no statement either way about forced sterilization, so I feel competent to decide it

2017-06-28 16:53:30 UTC  

mormonism

2017-06-28 16:53:36 UTC  

Traditional Civilization, which we must assume is a top-down structure, has in mind "morality" in terms of what is according to higher sensibilities, and what isn't

2017-06-28 16:53:52 UTC  

Broken families, ugliness, whoredom, spoiled children et cetera

2017-06-28 16:54:10 UTC  

this is what brings about erratic societies, with low inhibitions, against the standards of upper layers

2017-06-28 16:54:45 UTC  

So this morality is basically ethical and aesthetic, rather than purely emotional

2017-06-28 16:54:51 UTC  

what are higher sensibilities

2017-06-28 16:55:04 UTC  

the manusmriti details them pretty well

2017-06-28 16:55:29 UTC  

@fallot Form over formless for example

2017-06-28 16:55:30 UTC  

or rather what makes a sensibility high rather than low

2017-06-28 16:55:38 UTC  

what is a sensibility?

2017-06-28 16:55:50 UTC  

dunno, would appreciate something there too but didn't want to muddy it

2017-06-28 16:56:03 UTC  

wanted to just stick to high/low axis

2017-06-28 16:56:35 UTC  

You could say that striving towards permanent, non-transitory states would mark the typical Aristocratic outlook

2017-06-28 16:56:41 UTC  

The best example would be posture

2017-06-28 16:56:47 UTC  

I mean physical posture

2017-06-28 16:56:54 UTC  

Typical Aristocrat when he walks the street

2017-06-28 16:56:58 UTC  

permanence suffices?

2017-06-28 16:57:03 UTC  

Doesn't give away the signs of irrational activity

2017-06-28 16:57:22 UTC  

He doesn't walk too fast or too slow, doesn't look left and right, doesn't check out every passenger every billboard every event

2017-06-28 16:57:29 UTC  

can you make aristocratic transcendental faggotry @The Enlightened Shepherd

2017-06-28 16:57:33 UTC  

He keeps his head straight etc

2017-06-28 16:57:44 UTC  

is this possible

2017-06-28 16:57:44 UTC  

yeah fallot tear this shit up

2017-06-28 16:57:57 UTC  

no way

2017-06-28 16:58:27 UTC  

TES just a protip, there are details that matter and details that don't, I suggest dividing your aristocratic idea into those

2017-06-28 16:58:32 UTC  

I just wanna know how you can say something is "higher" (though of course I accept there is such a thing)

2017-06-28 16:58:53 UTC  

how Lord Flufflebottom walks on the street is not as important as who he puts on pikes and why

2017-06-28 16:59:00 UTC  

Well

2017-06-28 16:59:06 UTC  

I don't think you are exactly right

2017-06-28 16:59:07 UTC  

I mean

2017-06-28 16:59:11 UTC  

yeah, you're wrong

2017-06-28 16:59:12 UTC  

I'm speaking about ideals

2017-06-28 16:59:16 UTC  

there would be a way to walk perfectly

2017-06-28 16:59:18 UTC  

an ideal yes

2017-06-28 16:59:26 UTC  

This is merely ideal-typic picture

2017-06-28 16:59:38 UTC  

Yes

2017-06-28 16:59:40 UTC  

but now

2017-06-28 16:59:46 UTC  

we must say why that ideal is ideal fallot

2017-06-28 16:59:53 UTC  

What is it's primary, underlying characteristic

2017-06-28 16:59:57 UTC  

ancient aryans microanalyzed everything and tried to figure out the best way to do it