Message from @Death Strike's Bat
Discord ID: 330219771066843147
it's like a synopsis for the semi intelligent
people smart enough not to just sit passively at their pew or whatever, but not smart enough to comprehensively analyze ten different religions
@devolved here?
Sup
what are the moral implications of abandoning medicine to shuffle products and money
let's say this next year succeeds BIGLY
Why would you throw away all that work getting a degree
because I didn't have this opportunity before
Morally, no opinion really
I have to feel like doing medicine for the general public is almost immoral
scratch "almost," it's 100% bad
helping spergs outrun the consequences of their actions
giving hormones to trannies
Conclusion
Physicians who choose to provide quality care for a stigmatized patient population within a system that generally ignores its unique medical needs do so at the fringes of their clinical comfort zone. In the absence of a functional system of consistent and equitable care delivery for all patients, the onus of competent care often falls on conscientious individual clinicians who are passionate about caring for the underserved. As the sole clinician offering Jessie crucial gender affirmation, we argue that it is Dr. Lao’s responsibility to ensure Jessie receives all medically indicated interventions she desires, including hormone therapy. To do this, it is his clinical and ethical responsibility to perform due diligence by helping Jessie receive gender-affirming medical treatment, including hormone therapy, from an experienced clinician.
You've got a point
no matter how I slice it I would be far better for the world as a diet expert and clergyman
Probably true
this link is a horror show
You can approach any vocation morally or immoraly
I like the blurb
now to read it
great, it's not an article
the tweet is correct, this "counterculture" proceeds from anonymous figures and the anonymous multitude
the visible figures are not important
whether that is a good thing is worth debate, but I don't think the actual assertion is debateable
the visible figures did not precede the upswell
first came the change, then riding that wave came various figures
the kind of ideas Milo for instance has, they are a further iteration of stuff that has been slowly developed (on the internet, anonymously) for a couple of years
if someone asked me to name one, just one, person who I thought was the most important to all of this shit
despite not liking him very much I would say Steve Sailer
who, while not anonymous, is certainly not a visible figure
it s funny how you participate in talks anonymously and then 1 week later you see the talking points used by Milo or Cernovich
what incentive is to not be anonymous? save the magical white race? fuck that. if you risk your personal image, at least do it for shekels.
why don't you tell me
what the incentive is
I have the opposite impression