Message from @Nester

Discord ID: 345664239219769355


2017-08-11 20:11:28 UTC  

The most straightforward song in the album, I Feel Nothing: A->B->C1->C2->D->C1->C2->E->B->F->G1->G2->F->G1->G2->A->B->E

2017-08-11 20:12:00 UTC  

I'm liking it

2017-08-11 20:13:06 UTC  

I'm listening to it now as well, @UOC

2017-08-11 20:13:13 UTC  

I dunno anything about Alabama candidates

2017-08-11 20:13:36 UTC  

I was worried I wouldn't like it because some tech death loses the music for me but this is great

2017-08-11 20:13:51 UTC  

This isn't tech death

2017-08-11 20:13:54 UTC  

It's just technical

2017-08-11 20:13:59 UTC  

Like suffocation is technical

2017-08-11 20:14:46 UTC  

Yeah

2017-08-11 20:15:10 UTC  

I'm just saying that there is a risk that musicality is sacrificed for innovation or complexity or whatever

2017-08-11 20:15:27 UTC  

which I end up being interested in but not enjoying much musically

2017-08-11 20:16:30 UTC  

here in after the song is tight

2017-08-11 20:21:06 UTC  

I can't think of examples of bands being hurt by technicality.

2017-08-11 20:21:26 UTC  

The tech death bands say nothing complicatedly.

2017-08-11 20:21:56 UTC  

If you subtract their complexity from them, you would end up with nothing still.

2017-08-11 20:24:15 UTC  

well if it's good it doesn't suffer from being technical

2017-08-11 20:24:25 UTC  

Actually "technical" is a horrible descriptor.

2017-08-11 20:24:26 UTC  

but if it's bad, technicality won't save it for me

2017-08-11 20:24:32 UTC  

It doesn't explain anything important.

2017-08-11 20:25:38 UTC  

It would make sense to group chicken statues with other chicken statues, and cow statues with cow statues.

2017-08-11 20:26:16 UTC  

But not statues made with chisels with other statues made with chisels, and statues made with hammer and nail with statues made with hammer and nail.

2017-08-11 20:27:42 UTC  

Technical = this music is hard to play.

2017-08-11 20:27:45 UTC  

So what?

2017-08-11 20:35:08 UTC  

well if i were going to try to break what I mean down, I mean something like the use of more complex musical ideas and structures like atypical time sigs / changing time sigs; music composed in rare modes or even more esoteric composition approaches like chromaticism or stochastic shit influenced by classical guys like Cage or Penderecki or Stockhausen; music that abandons the pop/rock structure and more traditional classical structures

2017-08-11 20:36:28 UTC  

nothing is wrong with any of that

2017-08-11 20:36:51 UTC  

but many attempts to explore music through those means fail

2017-08-11 20:38:50 UTC  

these guys do some of this

2017-08-11 20:40:36 UTC  

some new Ihsahn stuff

2017-08-11 20:40:53 UTC  

is an unsuccessful exploration to me

2017-08-11 20:42:03 UTC  

Leprous

2017-08-11 20:42:32 UTC  

basically all djent lol

2017-08-11 20:43:24 UTC  

Gorguts sometimes verges on failure

2017-08-11 20:43:25 UTC  

Yes, but that tells you the how of the music, not what the music is about. The point of music is to say things, it makes most sense to categorize it on the basis of what it says. Technical bands like Immolation and Suffocation have much more in common with less technical bands like Pestilence and Autopsy than they do with Necrophagist and Spawn of Possession...etc.

2017-08-11 20:43:37 UTC  

I totally agree

2017-08-11 20:44:06 UTC  

I'm just saying that some bands who to me don't seem to have a decent artistic vision

2017-08-11 20:44:12 UTC  

still attempt a lot of musical complexity

2017-08-11 20:44:44 UTC  

and that is a certain flavor of uninteresting to me

2017-08-11 20:44:50 UTC  

Most good dm bands eschew pop structure, tech bands like immolation and suffocation aren't at all unique.

2017-08-11 20:45:34 UTC  

Yes, because musical genres now are meaningless niches.

2017-08-11 20:45:42 UTC  

Like porn genres.