I like a track or two

neoclassical as a term is good

but it would end up encompassing metal as well

by this usage

what I'm saying is we need to differentiate post-metal music

from the wider term neoclassical

I think it ends up erasing the contribution of riff language to the basic elements of musicality of these acts

a lot of this synthwave stuff is post-metal too

what about middle period Ulver stuff like Shadows of the Sun and Perdition City

not heard it

@UOC I refer to that by "Electronic"

really

not a sufficiently descriptive term though

I'm just trying to triangulate the term for my own understanding

im not disputing or anything

I understand

was referring to "Electronic"

actually

why don't I just link you his own words

sec

Zyklon those tweets are crazy. Rubio said something similarly slimey

http://web.archive.org/web/20080515023323/http://www.anus.com:80/zine/music/

he cast the net wide for this term

note that it is encompassing metal music

I jumped into the convo because i have had similar thoughts about a certain conversation or communication between the forward edges of some genres

including metal

go on

Britain is dead.

well for example the increasing similarities between some "electronic" music like Aphex Twin and modern "classical" or "art" music like Karlheinz Stockhausen

or Philip Glass

who basically writes techno for piano

yeah I see what you mean

you're right too

but this gets pretty metaphysical

hah we don't have to get into it

the possible implications are vast

get into your ideas @UOC

want to hear the gist

well mostly i'm interested in the direction of the flow. I think some stuff comes into the genres from art - I think Aphex Twin has listened to Stockhausen

but some stuff I think is the other way around- for example I think that Philip Glass has borrowed some ideas about repetition-as-structure from early electronic guys like Moroder