Message from @Claire
Discord ID: 347471571310346241
i thought this server got shoah'd?
or was that fake news
because I try to patch up my weaknesses
it didn't, but there was some danger of it
it need only be sufficiently vague so as to allow persons to have ah-ha moments. Functionally equivalent with horoscopes or palm readers.
I hear that criticism often
it doesn't really stand
there's a big difference between reading a horoscope (which I've never found to have any value)
My experience has been that as I matured and changed the quality of my thinking, my behavior changed and so did my MBTI results.
and reading your MBTI profile
while can seem like your mind if being read or something
me, @UOC , maybe this @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ guy though he could be INTP as well
One thing that doesn't seem to change are a person's aptitudes. I've taken the Johnson O'Connor tests and those still hold true today.
that's just the bullshit of a certain website
Alright
@fallot I don't even remember anymore. I've jotted them down somewhere. I took them a number of years apart and promptly dismissed them.
why dont you take it now
What is a quanifiable difference between horoscopes and MBTI so that I may determine whether or not you are making truth statements rather than value judgements?
I can't give you anything like that
the best thing would be
experience it yourself
do the test, find out your type, then read a type profile
which I will link you a few of when you do the test
then you can make up your mind how vague or specific it is
I may trust planets that have been around for billions of years and their influence on me before I trust the MBTI.
That would seem to validate my criticism.
Truth be told, I remember being impressed with the accuracy of the MBTI.
but what was your criticism @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻
I don't, however, think it is some permanent assessment of me and my thinking.
it is already validated
its a permanent assessment that you are a woman
that means something about your cognition
why can there not be other similar categories?