Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 351072996078911498
but marriage is for example, eugenics
not if retards do it
culture enforces eugenics, not human choice
you can't direct eugenics
likely to lead to massive unforseen second order or third order effects
I've seen some profoundly ugly members of your race fallot
okay
I don't want to be a dick about it but you need to sterilize your unibrows, manlets and curry smelling gnomes with sloped foreheads before you tell me about eugenics and culture
no, I'll tell you what I please
you can listen or not listen
I've met pakistanis with aryan enough features and good enough qualities that I would consider them peers
but they are not representative
i agree, eugenics, especially positive eugenics, is basic maintenance of a culture /civilization
I'd argue the negative eugenics are the important part (the sterilizing, aborting etc)
the indian subcontinent is an extremely stratified place
nation as understood in modern times
isn't important to me
my blood and my culture is
Race > Nation.
nation is actually likely to trump race
you can't make people care about their race
my blood is not my race
they are my close kin
a brit and a czech are not strongly united by race
The state is a means to an end for the race, this was Hitler's philosophy on the importance of the state.
that's because they are morons who lack tribal instinct
no, because they have tribal instinct
how is a czech the tribesman of a brit
this is a modern ideology
if they're surrounded by bantu, they are
this understanding of "white race"
the czechs I have met have been fine people
certainly
Nation = blood and ancestry.
no, nation is not reducible to blood
Race is an extension of that.
I do not care about nation either
that's where prozak and I differ
race is also not reducible to blood
How is it not?