Message from @Deleted User 57835c2c
Discord ID: 351073595402878977
my blood is not my race
they are my close kin
a brit and a czech are not strongly united by race
The state is a means to an end for the race, this was Hitler's philosophy on the importance of the state.
that's because they are morons who lack tribal instinct
no, because they have tribal instinct
how is a czech the tribesman of a brit
this is a modern ideology
if they're surrounded by bantu, they are
this understanding of "white race"
the czechs I have met have been fine people
certainly
Nation = blood and ancestry.
no, nation is not reducible to blood
Race is an extension of that.
I do not care about nation either
that's where prozak and I differ
race is also not reducible to blood
How is it not?
since I know what an aryan really is, I don't distinguish between an aryan german, an aryan ukrainian, or an aryan living in south america
because the edges are fuzzy, the liberal critique of biological race is correct
race is not a distinct material category, but a social construction that encompasses blood and culture
which is why you can split slavs and other whites with the word race and still feel the usage was correct
is there such a thing as whiteness, outside blood?
if there is, race must be more than blood
and the way I see it, the "aryan" part is the important part, not their local culture or whatever
I don't care what language an aryan speaks or what their national dish is, I care about their human quality
your priors are not clear
what is human quality
it seems to me human quality = aryanness
genetic/physical quality
and aryanness = human quality
its circular
it's simple
do they look like this? http://www.sptimes.com/News/020900/photos/nie-faces.jpg
are they tall, physically powerful, healthy, and long lived?
are they intelligent?
lets assume all the above, except they are also child rapists
or leftists
I see aryan society itself as a process, not a place