Message from @fallot

Discord ID: 352193169711955978


2017-08-29 20:40:53 UTC  

90% of the time coalburners fuck a nog and make a niglet, the nigger buck leaves

2017-08-29 20:40:54 UTC  

90%

2017-08-29 20:44:19 UTC  

82% on government assistance? the fuck

2017-08-29 20:45:08 UTC  

@J · the issue is qualia

2017-08-29 20:45:13 UTC  

what explains subjective experience

2017-08-29 20:45:35 UTC  

a reductionist interpretation can tell you how the brain works

2017-08-29 20:45:39 UTC  

it can't tell you why red is red

2017-08-29 20:45:57 UTC  

thats where im having issue i think, the last thing you said

2017-08-29 20:46:12 UTC  

where it's like in the article "it can explain why you see red, but not why you feel red"

2017-08-29 20:46:16 UTC  

that just makes no sense to me

2017-08-29 20:46:20 UTC  

the word feel should not have been used

2017-08-29 20:46:36 UTC  

when you see red, you see something, why do you see that something?

2017-08-29 20:46:46 UTC  

why does red have redness?

2017-08-29 20:47:00 UTC  

we assume everyone sees the same red when they see red

2017-08-29 20:47:11 UTC  

in their subjective experience

2017-08-29 20:47:42 UTC  

if some people saw a different "red"

2017-08-29 20:47:46 UTC  

how could you tell via reductionism?

2017-08-29 20:47:48 UTC  

yeah we do but not much changes if you assume they see the spectrum differently to me

2017-08-29 20:48:15 UTC  

not being unable to see red

2017-08-29 20:49:35 UTC  

so assuming you wouldn't be able to tell by examining their eyes and they see a different red because of something neurological

2017-08-29 20:49:55 UTC  

how could you tell?

2017-08-29 20:50:00 UTC  

yeah, assuming that's all the same

2017-08-29 20:50:33 UTC  

imagine a clone of you in every physical way

2017-08-29 20:50:42 UTC  

who sees your "red" as your "blue" and vice versa

2017-08-29 20:50:51 UTC  

and understands everything in those terms

2017-08-29 20:50:52 UTC  

and in the situation where that isn't actually a phenomenon that could exist

2017-08-29 20:51:12 UTC  

hmm?

2017-08-29 20:51:23 UTC  

I didn't understand your last sentence

2017-08-29 20:52:37 UTC  

hang on i need to organise my thoughts, this is new territory for me

2017-08-29 20:53:44 UTC  

what were you saying about the clone

2017-08-29 20:56:04 UTC  

in my current understanding I would think that there would not be a situation where there was a physically identical clone to me that saw red and blue differently to me, after all we're physically identical

2017-08-29 21:00:34 UTC  

how can you say so

2017-08-29 21:00:40 UTC  

how would you be able to tell

2017-08-29 21:01:38 UTC  

what I was saying about the clone is imagine one, identical to you in every physical way, who in their subjective experience sees your "red and "blue" switched

2017-08-29 21:01:49 UTC  

nothing would change about the way they apparently perceive the world

2017-08-29 21:01:58 UTC  

after all, they still see both those wavelengths of light

2017-08-29 21:02:26 UTC  

while your red is his blue, you wont be able to tell the difference if you sit down and talk to him about it

2017-08-29 21:02:33 UTC  

or compare looking at pictures etc.

2017-08-29 21:03:06 UTC  

I worked my arms out yesterday and they don't feel sore, is it ok to work them out again today?

2017-08-29 21:03:28 UTC  

yeah I would agree that there would be no way of knowing that there is a difference, and other people might well perceive colours differently to me but they're also not physically identical to me

2017-08-29 21:03:39 UTC  

yeah