Message from @Nester

Discord ID: 366370874074333194


2017-10-07 23:43:06 UTC  

it is a jewish biblical name

2017-10-07 23:43:08 UTC  

.wiki ezra

2017-10-07 23:43:13 UTC  

If you read old books, like translations of Nietzsche, Beowulf, etc, and compare it to modern English, the difference is smaller compared to Swedish 100 years ago and Swedish today

2017-10-07 23:43:15 UTC  

oops

2017-10-07 23:43:25 UTC  

the "saracen" equivalent is Uzair

2017-10-07 23:43:29 UTC  

my brother's name

2017-10-07 23:43:36 UTC  

(his is spelt Auzair)

2017-10-07 23:43:50 UTC  

It is still possible to speak proper English that would have been acceptable a good while back, without sounding like a dork

2017-10-07 23:43:53 UTC  

In Swedish that is not the case

2017-10-07 23:44:02 UTC  

I trigger people by using non dumbed down grammar

2017-10-07 23:44:07 UTC  

They chimp out

2017-10-07 23:44:28 UTC  

I'M NOT SO SURE ABOUT THAT. PEOPLE FREAK OUT OF YOU USE PROPER ENGLISH HERE.

2017-10-07 23:45:05 UTC  

POLYSYLLABIC WORDS WILL GET YOU OSTRACIZED

2017-10-07 23:45:23 UTC  

1600 year old arabic is still intelligible

2017-10-07 23:45:30 UTC  

today

2017-10-07 23:45:38 UTC  

Middle English is intelligible

2017-10-07 23:45:41 UTC  

it's just not socially acceptable to use

2017-10-07 23:46:09 UTC  

I want to go back to Swedish the way it was 100 years ago. The first time I read a book from 1900, I was amazed.

2017-10-07 23:46:49 UTC  

If you weren't retarded, and are an arab, you would understand 98% of what's said in 1600 year old arabic.

2017-10-07 23:46:51 UTC  

AMERICAN ENGLISH IS THE SAME. COMPARE PRESIDENTIAL SPEECHES FROM 1900 TO 2010. IT'S AN EMBARRASSMENT.

2017-10-07 23:47:03 UTC  

Or more if youre experienced

2017-10-07 23:47:15 UTC  

English 1600 years ago would most likely not be understood

2017-10-07 23:47:26 UTC  

I think at that point, it was still old English

2017-10-07 23:47:34 UTC  

more similar to the language in Beowulf than what we hear now

2017-10-07 23:48:12 UTC  

THE KING JAMES BIBLE OF 1611 IS QUITE READABLE AND INTELLIGIBLE

2017-10-07 23:48:21 UTC  

Yeah, but that's just 400 years ago

2017-10-07 23:48:26 UTC  

that's middle English

2017-10-07 23:48:35 UTC  

AH. I WAS LOOKING AT 1600 AS A YEAR.

2017-10-07 23:48:39 UTC  

MY MISTAKE.

2017-10-07 23:48:49 UTC  

I made the same mistake for a while

2017-10-07 23:49:03 UTC  

Even 2000 year old arabic

2017-10-07 23:49:28 UTC  

Shakespeare, the most famous writer of middle English, wrote with a certain accent in mind

2017-10-07 23:49:34 UTC  

Is understandable to a great degree

2017-10-07 23:49:38 UTC  

There are more rhymes if his texts are read with that accent

2017-10-07 23:50:57 UTC  

TUNES WRITTEN IN PROTO-NORWEGIAN

2017-10-07 23:54:12 UTC  

Windows + D stopped working

2017-10-07 23:54:17 UTC  

how annoying

2017-10-07 23:54:25 UTC  

I guess Linux really is better

2017-10-07 23:55:19 UTC  

AT SUCKING COCKS

2017-10-07 23:55:24 UTC  

LINUX = EXCELLENT FOR GETTING AIDS